Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 28, 2026
05:31
Examining Bilingual Language Control Using the Stroop Task
Published on: February 26, 2020
15.7K
A performance comparison between the two language versions of the Affective Go/No-Go test: A randomised crossover
Younghyun C Lyoo1, Shinwon Park1,2, Sejin Ju1,3
1Ewha Brain Institute, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, South Korea.
Summary
The Korean Affective Go/No-go (AGN) test shows comparable psychometric properties to its English version. This validation supports its use in assessing emotional processing across languages.
Area of Science:
- Psycholinguistics
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Psychometrics
Background:
- The Affective Go/No-go (AGN) test measures emotional processing.
- Cross-linguistic validation is crucial for standardized cognitive assessments.
- Previous AGN versions exist, but a validated Korean version was needed.
Purpose of the Study:
- To validate the Korean version of the Affective Go/No-go (AGN) test.
- To compare the psychometric properties of the Korean and English AGN versions.
- To assess the reliability and validity of the Korean AGN for emotional valence.
Main Methods:
- Randomized crossover study design.
- Korean and English AGN test administration to 15 advanced Korean English learners.
- Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICCs) for performance comparison.
Main Results:
- High ICCs observed for response latencies and commission errors (positive/neutral words).
- Lower ICCs for negative word commission errors and all omission errors.
- Non-significant interaction effects between language and word valence.
Conclusions:
- The Korean AGN test demonstrates comparable psychometric properties to the English version.
- The AGN test may be reliably used across different language versions for emotional processing assessment.
- Further research may explore nuances in negative word processing and omission errors.
More Related Videos
05:33Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effect of Induced Emotion on Grammar Learning
Published on: January 29, 2020
6.5K
08:24The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
1.2K
Related Concept Videos
01:16Crossover Experiments
4.7K
Crossover experiments, also called the repeated-measurements design, is a study design in which all experimental units are exposed to all treatments in different periods. Crossover experiments are generally used in psychology, the pharmaceutical industry, agriculture, and medicine.
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
4.7K
02:01Group Design
10.9K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
10.9K
01:20Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
674
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
674
01:15Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs
307
Body:Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...
307
01:13Multiple Comparison Tests
4.5K
Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
4.5K
01:09Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test
6.2K
The t-test is a statistical method used to compare the sample mean with a population mean or compare two means from two data sets. The test statistic is calculated from the standard deviation, mean, and number of measurements in the data set at a selected confidence interval and then compared to a table of critical values at this confidence level. If the test statistic is smaller than the critical value, the null hypothesis is accepted. In this case, we state that the difference between the...
6.2K