Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 28, 2026

06:04
Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages
Published on: March 24, 2023
899
Evaluating performance over time: Is improving better than being consistently good?
Monica Soliman1, Roger Buehler1
1a Wilfrid Laurier University.
The Journal of Social Psychology
|June 22, 2017
Summary
People prefer consistent high performance for achievement decisions, but value improving performance for potential-based choices. This highlights how decision context influences the evaluation of intertemporal performance records.
Area of Science:
- Decision Science
- Social Psychology
- Organizational Behavior
Background:
- Individuals often evaluate others using past performance data.
- A common dilemma involves choosing between consistently high performance and performance that improves over time to a high level.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how evaluators' preferences differ based on two distinct intertemporal performance profiles: consistent high performance versus improving performance.
- To explore the influence of decision context on the preference for these performance profiles.
Main Methods:
- Three studies were conducted using participants who evaluated hypothetical candidates (students, employees).
- Candidates presented two performance profiles: consistently high or improving to a high level.
- Evaluations focused on perceived performance, future expectations, and deservingness.
Main Results:
- Consistently high performers were rated higher on current performance but lower on future expectations compared to improving performers.
- In achievement-based decisions (e.g., scholarships), consistent performance was deemed more deserving.
- In potential-based decisions (e.g., promotions), improving performance was preferred.
- These preferences were mediated by the weight given to current performance versus future expectations.
Conclusions:
- The choice between consistent and improving performance depends on the decision context.
- Achievement-oriented decisions favor consistent performance, while potential-oriented decisions favor improving performance.
- Evaluators' weighting of performance and future expectations drives these context-dependent preferences.
Related Concept Videos
Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model
350
The Self-Evaluation Maintenance (SEM) model offers a psychological framework to understand how individuals’ self-esteem is influenced by the achievements of others, particularly those with whom they share close personal bonds. The SEM model operates when personal rather than social identity guides individuals. Central to this model is the notion that individuals have an inherent desire to preserve a favorable self-image, which is continuously shaped by interpersonal comparisons and...
350
Nursing Evaluation
4.6K
The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.
4.6K
Sources of Self-Esteem II: Performance Feedback
204
Self-esteem is intricately tied to our perception of competence and our ability to exert control over our lives. One of the primary sources of this perception is performance feedback — the ongoing evaluation of our actions in terms of success and failure. According to Franks and Marolla (1976), people derive self-worth from experiencing themselves as causal agents, capable of achieving goals and overcoming obstacles. This process nurtures a critical component of self-esteem:...
204
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification
5.8K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
5.8K
Increasing Function
424
An increasing function exhibits a rise in output values as input values increase. This behavior is depicted graphically as a curve or line that slopes upward from left to right. Such a function satisfies the condition that if x1 < x2, then f(x1) < f(x2), indicating that the function values grow with increasing inputs. This concept is fundamental in understanding growth trends across various domains, such as population dynamics, financial investments, or resource consumption.The...
424
Regression Toward the Mean
7.2K
Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when...
7.2K

