Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...

Improving Translational Accuracy

Improving Translational Accuracy

Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...

Improving Translational Accuracy

Improving Translational Accuracy

Bonferroni Test

Bonferroni Test

The Bonferroni test is a statistical test named after Carlo Emilio Bonferroni, an Italian mathematician best known for Bonferroni inequalities. This statistical test is a type of multiple comparison test to determine which means are different than the rest. Bonferroni test can minimize the Type 1 error by reducing the significance level alpha, which otherwise increases with sample pairs.
The means of different samples are first paired in all possible combinations.
The null hypothesis of the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Twenty-five years beyond "Our Stolen Future": How did we progress as an international society on screening and regulating Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals (EDCs)?

Environmental research·2022

Same author

Impacts of endocrine disrupting chemicals on reproduction in wildlife and humans.

Environmental research·2021

Same author

A review of the underlying genetics and emerging therapies for canine cardiomyopathies.

Journal of veterinary cardiology : the official journal of the European Society of Veterinary Cardiology·2021

Same author

Negative relationships between species richness and temporal variability are common but weak in natural systems.

Ecology·2018

Same author

Domperidone upregulates dopamine receptor expression and stimulates locomotor activity in larval zebrafish (Danio rerio).

Genes, brain, and behavior·2018

Same author

Differential transcriptome regulation by 3,5-T2 and 3',3,5-T3 in brain and liver uncovers novel roles for thyroid hormones in tilapia.

Scientific reports·2017

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 28, 2026

An Allele-specific Gene Expression Assay to Test the Functional Basis of Genetic Associations

An Allele-specific Gene Expression Assay to Test the Functional Basis of Genetic Associations

Published on: November 3, 2010

Optimal alpha reduces error rates in gene expression studies: a meta-analysis approach.

J F Mudge¹, C J Martyniuk², J E Houlahan³

¹Department of Biology, Canadian Rivers Institute, University of New Brunswick, Saint John, NB, E2L 4L5, Canada.

BMC Bioinformatics

|June 23, 2017

Summary

Optimal alpha statistical thresholds minimize both Type I and Type II errors in transcriptomic studies, outperforming traditional methods like Bonferroni and FDR adjustments.

Keywords:

High throughput analysis Microarrays Multiple comparisons Optimal α Post-hoc corrections RNA-seq Type I and II error rates

More Related Videos

A Protocol for Using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis to Identify the Appropriate Animal Model for Translational Research

A Protocol for Using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis to Identify the Appropriate Animal Model for Translational Research

Published on: August 16, 2017

Optimization for Sequencing and Analysis of Degraded FFPE-RNA Samples

Optimization for Sequencing and Analysis of Degraded FFPE-RNA Samples

Published on: June 8, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 28, 2026

An Allele-specific Gene Expression Assay to Test the Functional Basis of Genetic Associations

An Allele-specific Gene Expression Assay to Test the Functional Basis of Genetic Associations

Published on: November 3, 2010

A Protocol for Using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis to Identify the Appropriate Animal Model for Translational Research

A Protocol for Using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis to Identify the Appropriate Animal Model for Translational Research

Published on: August 16, 2017

Optimization for Sequencing and Analysis of Degraded FFPE-RNA Samples

Optimization for Sequencing and Analysis of Degraded FFPE-RNA Samples

Published on: June 8, 2020

Area of Science:

Molecular Biology
Bioinformatics
Genomics

Background:

Transcriptomic studies using microarray and RNA-seq generate large datasets, complicating hypothesis testing.
Existing methods for multiple comparisons primarily focus on minimizing Type I errors, often increasing Type II errors.
A novel approach, optimal alpha, was developed to minimize both Type I and Type II errors.

Purpose of the Study:

To evaluate the effectiveness of the optimal alpha approach in reducing statistical errors in transcriptomic data analysis.
To compare optimal alpha with common statistical adjustment methods.

Main Methods:

Meta-analysis of 242 microarray studies.
Application and comparison of optimal alpha with no adjustment, Bonferroni, and False Discovery Rate (FDR) adjustments.

Main Results:

Current statistical practices result in high Type II error rates.
Optimal alpha demonstrated error rates as low or lower than no adjustment, Bonferroni, and FDR methods.
Optimal alpha effectively reduces errors in both microarray and RNA-seq experiments.

Conclusions:

Optimal alpha offers a superior method for setting statistical thresholds in transcriptomics.
Improved statistical methods alone are insufficient; enhanced experimental design with larger sample sizes and replication is crucial for high-throughput data.