Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 27, 2026

Use of Two Intracorporeal Ventricular Assist Devices As a Total Artificial Heart
Published on: May 11, 2018
Conduction Abnormalities and Permanent Pacemaker Implantation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Using the
Rajiv Rampat1, M Zeeshan Khawaja1, Roland Hilling-Smith1
1Department of Cardiology, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals, Brighton, United Kingdom.
Thirty-two percent of patients receiving the LOTUS valve required a pacemaker post-procedure, with pre-existing conduction issues and non-calcified valves increasing risk. Left bundle branch block developed in 55% of patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Biomaterials in Medical Devices
Background:
- Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is frequently associated with the need for permanent pacemaker implantation.
- Pacing rates after TAVR vary depending on the specific device used, with previous studies reporting rates around 29% for the LOTUS device.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the incidence of pacemaker implantation up to hospital discharge following LOTUS bioprosthesis implantation.
- To identify factors influencing pacing rate and the need for pacemaker implantation after LOTUS valve implantation in the United Kingdom.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective data collection from 228 patients who received the LOTUS device between March 2013 and February 2015 across 10 UK centers.
- Exclusion of 27 patients (12%) with pre-existing pacemakers.
- Analysis of patient demographics, pre-procedural electrocardiogram findings, and procedural characteristics to identify predictors of pacemaker implantation.
Main Results:
- 32% of patients (64 out of 201 analyzed) required pacemaker implantation, with a median time to insertion of 3.0 days.
- The primary indications for pacing were atrioventricular (AV) block (72%) or left bundle branch block (LBBB) with first-degree AV block (17%).
- Pre-procedural conduction abnormalities (OR: 2.54; p=0.048) and absence of aortic valve calcification (OR: 0.55; p=0.031) were independently associated with increased pacing need.
Conclusions:
- Following LOTUS valve implantation, 55% of patients developed LBBB and 32% required a pacemaker during the index admission.
- Patients with pre-procedural conduction disturbances and non-calcified aortic valves demonstrated a higher likelihood of requiring pacing.
- No other anatomical features were identified as increasing the pacing requirement for the LOTUS device.
More Related Videos
11:49Autologous Endothelial Progenitor Cell-Seeding Technology and Biocompatibility Testing For Cardiovascular Devices in Large Animal Model
Published on: September 9, 2011
08:30A Porcine Heterotopic Heart Transplantation Protocol for Delivery of Therapeutics to a Cardiac Allograft
Published on: February 14, 2022