Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 27, 2026

05:23
Motor Dual-Tasks for Gait Analysis and Evaluation in Post-Stroke Patients
Published on: March 11, 2021
3.0K
Examining Transfer Effects of Dual-Task Training Protocols for a Complex Locomotor Task.
Timothy A Worden1, Lori Ann Vallis1,2
1a Department of Human Health and Nutritional Sciences , University of Guelph , Guelph , Ontario , Canada.
Journal of Motor Behavior
|June 24, 2017
Summary
Dual-task training for obstacle crossing and auditory Stroop tasks (OBS+Stroop) showed that training must closely match the target task. Proximally related training improved safety, while computer training did not.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Human Movement Science
- Cognitive Psychology
Background:
- Dual-tasking, involving simultaneous performance of cognitive and motor tasks, is crucial for daily activities.
- Obstacle crossing and auditory Stroop tasks (OBS+Stroop) are common dual-task scenarios.
- Optimizing training for dual-task performance is essential for enhancing functional mobility and cognitive function.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the effectiveness of different training protocols on dual-task performance in OBS+Stroop.
- To determine if training specificity influences transfer effects and strategy adoption.
- To identify optimal training strategies for improving dual-task abilities.
Main Methods:
- Experiment 1 involved baseline OBS+Stroop testing, followed by proximally related walking training, and post-training retesting.
- Experiment 2 examined transfer effects using a distally related computer game training paradigm with the same testing protocol.
- Performance metrics included dual-task interference, obstacle crossing strategy, and reaction times.
Main Results:
- Proximally related training led to a more cautious obstacle crossing strategy, suggesting improved safety.
- Computer game training improved some dual-task performance measures but did not induce safer stepping strategies.
- Training specificity was critical; outcomes were more positive when training closely resembled the target OBS+Stroop tasks.
Conclusions:
- Dual-task training effectiveness is highly dependent on its similarity to the targeted tasks.
- Proximally related training appears more effective for promoting safer navigation strategies during obstacle crossing.
- Future research should focus on task-specific training designs to maximize dual-task performance improvements.

