Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 27, 2026

Digital Home-Monitoring of Patients after Kidney Transplantation: The MACCS Platform
Published on: April 12, 2021
Tailored Communication Within Mobile Apps for Diabetes Self-Management: A Systematic Review
Heidi Holmen1,2, Astrid Klopstad Wahl2, Milada Cvancarova Småstuen1
1Department of Nursing and Health Promotion, Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Sciences, Oslo, Norway.
Mobile apps with integrated healthcare communication show potential for diabetes self-management, but more high-quality research is needed to confirm their effectiveness. Current studies have limitations, hindering reliable evidence for widespread adoption.
Area of Science:
- Digital health interventions
- Diabetes management
- Health communication
Background:
- Increasing diabetes prevalence necessitates enhanced self-management support.
- Traditional patient-provider communication is evolving with digital tools.
- Mobile apps offer a platform for communication, but integrated healthcare personnel feedback needs investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review studies on mobile apps with integrated communication for diabetes self-management.
- To evaluate study characteristics, functions, outcomes, effects, and methodological quality.
- To assess the evidence for tailored feedback between patients with diabetes and healthcare personnel via apps.
Main Methods:
- Systematic literature search (2008-2016) in major databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, etc.).
- Adherence to PROSPERO protocol and PRISMA guidelines.
- Methodological quality assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool.
Main Results:
- 6 studies involving 431 participants were included; trials were small and short.
- Integrated communication primarily involved non-real-time written feedback; blood glucose tracking was common.
- 3 studies showed statistically significant improvements in primary outcomes (HbA1c or blood pressure); usability was generally positive, but overall study quality was uncertain.
Conclusions:
- The field requires more high-quality trials due to heterogeneity and methodological limitations.
- Limited integrated communication features and small sample sizes hinder reliable evidence generation.
- Further rigorous research is essential to establish the efficacy of these digital health tools for diabetes care.
Related Concept Videos
Diabetes: Management and Pharmacotherapy
Insulin remains the cornerstone of treatment for most patients with type 1 and many...
SBAR II: Application of SBAR
SBAR Report from a Nurse to a Health Care Provider
S: "Hello, Dr. Smith. This is Jane, RN, from the Med Surg unit. I am calling to tell you about Ms. White in Room 210, who is experiencing increased pain and redness at her incision site. Her recent...
Diabetes Mellitus: Overview and Type I Subtype
Type 1 diabetes is an autoimmune disease in which the immune system mistakenly attacks and destroys the insulin-producing beta cells in the pancreas. As a result, the body is unable to produce sufficient insulin, and individuals with...
Techniques of Therapeutic Communication II: Focusing, Paraphrasing, and Summarizing
This therapeutic technique can also be used when a patient brings up pertinent information during a health-related conversation. The...
Diabetes Mellitus: Type 2 and Gestational
Role of Communication in the Nursing Process I: Assessment and Diagnosis
The nursing process considers the patient's emotional and physical well-being. The process can be repeated or stopped at any point if judged essential. Assessment is the first step in the nursing...

