Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 27, 2026

Fully Endoscopic Mitral Valve Repair with Percutaneous Cannulation of Groin Vessels
Published on: May 26, 2023
Optimal percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel
An Vu Nguyen1, Le Van Thanh2, Mohamed Gomaa Kamel3
1Pham Ngoc Thach University of Medicine, Ho Chi Minh City, 70000, Viet Nam.
Insights
Complete revascularization (CR) is superior to culprit-only revascularization (COR) for patients with MVD-STEMI, reducing major adverse cardiac events and repeat procedures. Immediate CR may offer a slight benefit over staged CR, though not statistically significant.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Interventional Cardiology
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) strategies vary, including culprit-only (COR) and complete revascularization (CR).
- CR can be performed immediately (ICR) or staged (SCR).
- Optimal PCI strategy for MVD-STEMI patients remains under investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy and safety of COR versus CR (ICR and SCR) in MVD-STEMI patients.
- To evaluate major adverse cardiac events (MACE), mortality, and repeat revascularization rates.
- To assess differences between ICR and SCR when compared to COR.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of 13 randomized controlled trials.
- Inclusion criteria: comparison of at least two PCI strategies.
- Adjusted analysis using person-years to pool rate ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).
Main Results:
- COR significantly increased MACE (RR 1.67) and repeat revascularization (RR 2.12) compared to CR.
- COR also increased MACE, cardiovascular mortality, MI, and repeat PCI for both ICR and SCR.
- No significant differences were observed in all-cause mortality, MI, non-cardiovascular mortality, stroke, or bleeding.
Conclusions:
- Complete revascularization (CR) is superior to culprit-only revascularization (COR) for MVD-STEMI patients regarding MACE and repeat revascularization.
- CR demonstrates comparable safety outcomes to COR.
- A trend towards reduced cardiovascular mortality and MI was noted for immediate CR (ICR) versus staged CR (SCR) when matched with COR, though not statistically significant.
Background:
Our study aimed to compare three different percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) approaches: culprit-only (COR) and complete (CR) revascularization - categorizing into immediate (ICR) or staged (SCR).
Methods:
We searched 13 databases for randomized controlled trials. Articles were included if they compared at least two strategies. To have more studies in each analysis, an adjusted analysis was performed using person-years to incorporate follow-up durations and obtain pooled rate ratios (RR), with their corresponding 95% confidence interval.
Results:
Thirteen trials were included with a population of 2830 patients. COR significantly increased major adverse cardiac event (MACE) (adjusted RR 1.67, 95% CI: 1.27-2.19) and repeat revascularization (2.12, 1.67-2.69), which was driven by repeat PCI, without any difference in all-cause mortality and myocardial infarction (MI) compared to CR. When categorizing CR into SCR and ICR, the trend repeated with COR increased MACE (1.99, 1.53-2.6 for ICR), cardiovascular mortality (2.06, 1.07-3.96 for ICR), MI for ICR (1.72, 1.04-2.86), repeat revascularization and repeat PCI for both ICR and SCR. Non-cardiovascular mortality, stroke, nephropathy, re-hospitalization, stent thrombosis and bleeding were similar among all approaches.
Conclusions:
In MVD-STEMI patients, CR is better than COR in terms of MACE, cardiovascular mortality, repeat revascularization with no difference in safety outcomes. There was a trend towards to a reduction of cardiovascular mortality and MI in ICR compared to SCR when each matched with COR; even though there is no statistically significant difference between ICR and SCR when compared together.
More Related Videos
06:59Catheter-based Endovascular Angioplasty for Fibrosing Mediastinitis-associated Pulmonary Vein Stenosis
Published on: August 26, 2025
05:41Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery Ligation for Ischemia-Reperfusion Research: Model Improvement via Technical Modifications and Quality Control
Published on: December 16, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Angina IV: Management