[Long-term effectiveness of transvaginal high uterosacral ligament suspension]

Objective: To assess the long-term effectiveness of the transvaginal high uterosacral ligament suspension (HUS) in women suffering from advanced pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Methods: A retrospective review of records identified 118 women who underwent transvaginal HUS with or without additional concomitant anterior and (or) posterior repairs from June 2003 to August 2009 in the First Affiliated Hospital, General Hospital of People's Liberation Army. Of 118 women, 104 women completed the follow-up during study period; these 104 women were analysed. Follow-up visits were performed 2, 6 and 12 months after surgery and then annually. Anatomic results of POP was established by pelvic examination using pelvic organ prolapse quantitation system (POP-Q) staging. Funtional results were obtained by patient global impression of improvement (PGI-I), pelvic floor distress inventory-short form 20 (PFDI-20) and pelvic floor impact questionnaire short form (PFIQ-7). Surgical success required the fulfillment of all 3 criteria: (1) prolapse leading edge of 0 cm or less and apex of 1/2 total vaginal length or less; (2) the absence of pelvic organ prolapse symptoms as reported on the PFDI-20 question No. 3 ( "Do you usually have a bulge or something falling out that you can see or feel in your vaginal area?" ); and (3) no prolapse reoperations or pessary use during the study period. Results: The mean follow-up time was (9.1±1.5) years. The overall surgery success rate was 91.3% (95/104) according to above all 3 criteria. Prolapse recurrence rates were isolated anterior 6.7% (7/104), isolated apical 0, isolated posterior 2.9% (3/104) and multiple compartments 1.0% (1/104). Five women (4.8%, 5/104) developed bothersome vaginal bulge symptoms. None of recurrent women underwent retreatment, including either surgery or use of a pessary at last follow-up. The subjective satisfaction rate was 90.4% (94/104). PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7 scores showed a statistically significant improvement from preoperative 72 and 65 points to postoperative 17 and 9 points respectively (all P<0.01). There was a 2.9% (3/104) rate of intraoperative ureteral kinking and 3.8% (4/104) rate of postoperative morbidity. Conclusions: The transvaginal HUS for vault prolapse offers good long-term anatomical results with excellent vault suspension. With additional concomitant anterior and (or) posterior repairs, it will be a reconstructive surgery for the majority of advanced POP. It is minimal traumatic and appropriate for different type of POP, especially for the eldly patients. It is worthy of being popularized for clinical application.