Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 27, 2026

Surgical Approach and Complications of Stand-alone Lateral Trans-Psoas Interbody Fusion
Published on: February 14, 2025
Obesity and its implications on nononcological urological surgery
Andrea Mari1, Mohammad Abufaraj, Karim Mansy
1aDepartment of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria bDivision of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan cDepartment of Urology, University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.
Obesity presents surgical challenges in urology, but evidence suggests many nononcological procedures are feasible and safe for obese patients. Success and complication rates are often comparable to nonobese individuals, though specific precautions may be needed.
Area of Science:
- Urology
- Surgical Oncology
- Obesity Medicine
Background:
- Obesity is increasingly prevalent in clinical practice.
- Obesity poses significant operative challenges and is associated with increased postoperative complications.
- Understanding the impact of obesity on nononcological urological surgery is crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review and summarize the current literature on the implications of obesity in nononcological urological surgery.
- To assess the feasibility, safety, and outcomes of these procedures in obese patients.
Main Methods:
- Comprehensive literature search with an emphasis on publications from the last 18 months.
- Review and synthesis of existing studies on obesity and nononcological urological interventions.
Main Results:
- Data on incontinence surgery in obese patients are inconsistent, but success rates are high with low complication rates, comparable to nonobese women.
- Percutaneous nephrolithotomy and minipercutaneous nephrolithotomy are effective and well-tolerated in obese patients undergoing renal surgery.
- While specific precautions and instruments are necessary, evidence supports the feasibility and safety of various nononcological urological procedures in obese individuals.
Conclusions:
- Despite a lack of randomized clinical data and some inconsistent study results, evidence supports the feasibility and safety of nononcological urological interventions in obese patients.
- Success rates and overall complication rates in obese patients appear comparable to nonobese patients for many procedures, with notable exceptions.
- Further research is needed to solidify evidence, particularly through randomized clinical trials.
Related Concept Videos
Drug Dosing: Obese Patients
Pharmacokinetics in Obese Patients: Drug Absorption and Distribution
Pharmacokinetics in Obese Patients: Drug Metabolism and Excretion
Obesity
Urinary Tract Calculi VI: Surgical Management
Inflammatory Bowel Disease V: Surgical Management
Here are some common surgical interventions for IBD:

