Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 27, 2026

Isokinetic Robotic Device to Improve Test-Retest and Inter-Rater Reliability for Stretch Reflex Measurements in Stroke Patients with Spasticity
Published on: June 12, 2019
ACSC Indicator: testing reliability for hypertension
Robin L Walker1, William A Ghali1,2,3, Guanmin Chen1,2
1Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, 3280 Hospital Dr. NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 4Z6, Canada.
Insights
Physician agreement on avoidable hospitalizations for uncomplicated hypertension was poor. This suggests the health indicator
Area of Science:
- Healthcare quality assessment
- Primary care effectiveness
- Health services research
Background:
- Ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSC) hospitalizations are considered avoidable with high-quality primary care.
- Assessing the avoidability of these hospitalizations is crucial for evaluating healthcare system performance.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the inter-physician reliability of judgments regarding avoidable hospitalizations for uncomplicated hypertension, an Ambulatory Care Sensitive Condition (ACSC).
Main Methods:
- A random sample of 82 patients hospitalized for uncomplicated hypertension (an ACSC) in Calgary, Alberta, was reviewed.
- Three internal medicine specialists used implicit methods and a validated 5-point scale to judge the avoidability of each hospitalization.
- Inter-rater reliability was assessed using Cohen's kappa (κ) statistic.
Main Results:
- Overall agreement among the three physicians was poor (κ = 0.092).
- Agreement was particularly low between two pairs of raters (κ = -0.119 and κ = -0.008), indicating agreement less than chance.
- When the scale was dichotomized, fair agreement was observed (κ = 0.217), with reported avoidable proportions varying significantly among physicians (6.1% to 32.9%).
Conclusions:
- There is poor to fair agreement among physicians when judging the avoidability of hospitalizations for uncomplicated hypertension.
- The validity and utility of using ACSC hospitalizations as a health indicator are questionable due to low inter-rater reliability.
- Development of explicit criteria for judging avoidability of ACSC hospitalizations is recommended, or consideration should be given to abandoning this indicator.
Background:
With high-quality community-based primary care, hospitalizations for ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSC) are considered avoidable. The purpose of this study was to test the inter-physician reliability of judgments of avoidable hospitalizations for one ACSC, uncomplicated hypertension, derived from medical chart review.
Methods:
We applied the Canadian Institute for Health Information's case definition to obtain a random sample of patients who had an ACSC hospitalization for uncomplicated hypertension in Calgary, Alberta. Medical chart review was conducted by three experienced internal medicine specialists. Implicit methods were used to judge avoidability of hospitalization using a validated 5-point scale.
Results:
There was poor agreement among three physicians raters when judging the avoidability of 82 ACSC hospitalizations for uncomplicated hypertension (κ = 0.092). The κ also remained low when assessing agreement between raters 1 and 3 (κ = 0.092), but the κ was lower (less than chance agreement) for raters 1 and 2 (κ = -0.119) and raters 2 and 3 (κ = -0.008). When the 5-point scale was dichotomized, there was fair agreement among three raters (κ = 0.217). The proportion of ACSC hospitalizations for uncomplicated hypertension that were rated as avoidable was 32.9%, 6.1% and 26.8% for raters 1, 2, and 3, respectively.
Conclusions:
This study found a low proportion of ACSC hospitalization were rated as avoidable, with poor to fair agreement of judgment between physician raters. This suggests that the validity and utility of this health indicator is questionable. It points to a need to abandon the use of ACSC entirely; or alternatively to work on the development of explicit criteria for judging avoidability of hospitalization for ACSC such as hypertension.
Related Concept Videos
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(two-step method)
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure
Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(one-step method)
Prepare for the Procedure:
Hypertension III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies

