Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 27, 2026

09:42
Author Spotlight: Using Motor Imagery Brain-Computer Interface to Improve Motor and Cognitive Function in Stroke Patients
Published on: September 1, 2023
2.2K
Interindividual differences in motor network connectivity and behavioral response to iTBS in stroke patients
Svenja Diekhoff-Krebs1, Eva-Maria Pool2, Anna-Sophia Sarfeld1
1Neuromodulation & Neurorehabilitation, Max Planck Institute for Neurological Research, Gleueler Str. 50, 50931 Köln, Germany.
Neuroimage. Clinical
|June 28, 2017
Summary
Stroke patients
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Rehabilitation Medicine
Background:
- Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) aims to induce cerebral plasticity for neural reorganization, particularly after stroke.
- Interindividual variability in motor improvement following rTMS of the primary motor cortex (M1) is a significant challenge in stroke rehabilitation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the relationship between interindividual differences in motor network connectivity and behavioral responses to excitatory rTMS in stroke patients.
- To determine if baseline network connectivity predicts the efficacy of intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS) in improving hand motor function after stroke.
Main Methods:
- Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and dynamic causal modeling (DCM) were used to assess effective connectivity in motor networks of chronic stroke patients and healthy controls.
- Patients received intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS) over the ipsilesional primary motor cortex (M1) or control stimulation, with motor performance and cortical excitability measured before and after.
Main Results:
- Stronger endogenous coupling between the supplemental motor area (SMA) and M1 was associated with better baseline motor performance in patients.
- iTBS over ipsilesional M1 increased M1 excitability and decreased contralesional M1 excitability compared to control stimulation.
- Individual improvements in hand motor function after iTBS correlated with pre-intervention neural coupling strengths within the stimulated hemisphere, particularly connections to M1.
Conclusions:
- Interindividual variability in response to iTBS for stroke-related motor deficits is influenced by baseline motor network connectivity.
- Baseline connectivity patterns, especially within the lesioned hemisphere's motor network, can predict the effectiveness of rTMS interventions.
- Understanding these connectivity-behavior relationships may help personalize rTMS therapy for stroke patients.

