Related Experiment Videos
A hospital outbreak of Clostridium difficile?
The Journal of Hospital Infection
|September 1, 1985
Summary
Increased Clostridium difficile testing, not an outbreak, led to a hospital ward closure. Clinical judgment, not just lab results, is crucial for managing potential colitis cases.
Area of Science:
- Infectious Diseases
- Hospital Epidemiology
- Clinical Microbiology
Background:
- A rise in Clostridium difficile detection in stool samples prompted concern over a potential hospital-acquired infection (nosocomial outbreak) in a London hospital.
- This led to significant disruption, including ward closure and extensive investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the cause of increased Clostridium difficile detection.
- To evaluate the clinical significance of laboratory findings versus clinical presentation.
- To assess the impact of diagnostic practices on patient care and hospital resources.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of laboratory data for Clostridium difficile toxin detection.
- Review of clinical records and patient management during the period of increased detection.
- Assessment of the financial and patient care costs associated with the episode.
Main Results:
- The apparent increase in Clostridium difficile cases was attributed to heightened laboratory investigation rather than a true epidemiological outbreak.
- The episode resulted in considerable financial costs and negative impacts on patient care.
- Laboratory data alone were insufficient to confirm colitis or guide infection control measures.
Conclusions:
- Caution is necessary when interpreting elevated Clostridium difficile detection rates in stool specimens.
- Clinical assessment and criteria are paramount for diagnosing Clostridium difficile-associated colitis.
- Decisions regarding treatment and infection spread control must integrate laboratory alerts with clinical judgment.