Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 27, 2026

Evaluation of Coronary Flow Reserve After Myocardial Ischemia Reperfusion in Rats
Published on: June 28, 2019
Fractional flow reserve (FFR)-based therapy in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome: Current data and
Grzegorz Zuk1, Dariusz Ciecwierz, Natalia Cwalina
1First Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Gdansk, Debinki 7, 80-952, Gdansk, Poland. grzegorz.zuk13@gmail.com cedario@o2.pl.
Insights
Fractional flow reserve (FFR) in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is less reliable due to microvascular dysfunction, making its clinical role controversial. More research is needed to understand FFR
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Cardiovascular Physiology
Background:
- Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is an established diagnostic tool for coronary artery stenosis in stable coronary artery disease (CAD).
- Microvascular dysfunction in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) can affect FFR reliability.
- The clinical utility of FFR in ACS remains debated due to conflicting study results.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the current knowledge on the application of FFR in the setting of ACS.
- To highlight the controversies and limitations of FFR use in acute scenarios.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing literature and clinical trials on FFR in ACS.
- Analysis of discrepant study findings regarding FFR efficacy in ACS.
Main Results:
- Limited randomized clinical trials exist for FFR-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in ACS.
- Published studies show inconsistent outcomes, indicating a need for further investigation.
- FFR's role in acute settings is substantially understudied.
Conclusions:
- The reliability of FFR in ACS is questionable due to underlying pathophysiology.
- Further research, including robust clinical trials, is essential to define FFR's role in managing ACS patients.
Abstract:
Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is an evidence-based diagnostic tool of physiological significance of coronary artery stenosis in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD). Due to microvascular dysfunction in acute coronary syndrome (ACS), information obtained from FFR assessment could be less reliable and, thus, its clinical role remains controversial. Indeed, results of currently published studies are essentially discrepant. Only a few randomized clinical trials have been performed showing the efficacy of FFR-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in ACS. Consequently, its role in acute scenarios remains substantially understudied. Herein, is presented the current state of knowledge re-garding FFR use in ACS setting. (Cardiol J 2017; 24, 4: 426-435).
More Related Videos
05:07Author Spotlight: Improved Localization and Monitoring of Coronary Flow Reserve Using Modified PLAX View in Mice
Published on: August 25, 2023
06:39Ultrasound Based Assessment of Coronary Artery Flow and Coronary Flow Reserve Using the Pressure Overload Model in Mice
Published on: April 13, 2015
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Acute Coronary Syndrome V: Nursing Management
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Angina IV: Management