Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 27, 2026

10:32
Development of a Virtual Reality Assessment of Everyday Living Skills
Published on: April 23, 2014
19.4K
The Dot Counting Test adds up: Validation and response pattern analysis in a mixed clinical veteran sample
Jason R Soble1, Octavio A Santos1, Kathleen M Bain1
1a Psychology Service , South Texas Veterans Health Care System , San Antonio , TX , USA .
Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology
|June 29, 2017
Summary
The Dot Counting Test (DCT) effectively identifies invalid performance in veterans, showing high accuracy and specificity. Cognitive impairment impacts completion time but not accuracy, validating the DCT as a non-memory-based performance validity test (PVT).
Area of Science:
- Neuropsychology
- Clinical Psychology
- Forensic Psychology
Background:
- Performance validity tests (PVTs) are crucial for detecting noncredible effort in clinical evaluations.
- The Dot Counting Test (DCT) is a non-memory-based PVT requiring further validation in diverse clinical samples.
- Veteran populations present unique challenges for performance assessment due to potential cognitive and psychological comorbidities.
Purpose of the Study:
- To cross-validate the Dot Counting Test (DCT) as a performance validity test (PVT) in a mixed clinical veteran sample.
- To examine the influence of cognitive impairment on DCT performance, including completion time and error patterns.
- To determine the diagnostic accuracy of the DCT in identifying noncredible responding within this population.
Main Methods:
- A cross-sectional study involving 77 veterans who completed the DCT during clinical evaluation.
- Participants were classified as valid (74%) or noncredible (26%) using established PVTs (Word Memory Test and Test of Memory Malingering).
- Cognitive impairment status was assessed, and DCT completion times and error scores (E-scores) were analyzed by validity and cognitive groups.
Main Results:
- The DCT demonstrated significant differences in completion times and error rates between valid and noncredible participants.
- Noncredible individuals exhibited longer completion times, more errors, and higher E-scores compared to valid participants.
- DCT E-scores accurately predicted group membership (83.1% accuracy, AUC=.87), with an optimal cut-score of 15 yielding 70% sensitivity and 88% specificity.
Conclusions:
- The Dot Counting Test (DCT) is a valid and reliable performance validity test (PVT) for use with mixed clinical veteran samples.
- The DCT effectively distinguishes between credible and noncredible responding, even in the presence of cognitive impairment.
- Findings support the DCT's utility as a non-memory-based PVT, contributing valuable data to neuropsychological assessments in veteran populations.

