Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 27, 2026

A Murine Model of Stent Implantation in the Carotid Artery for the Study of Restenosis
Published on: May 14, 2013
Impact of Stent Type and Presence of Vasospastic Angina on Long-Term Prognosis
Reo Hata1, Naoki Oka1, Shunsuke Kubo1
1Department of Cardiology, Kurashiki Central Hospital.
Insights
The type of stent used in vasospastic angina (VSA) impacts patient outcomes. Sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) showed worse results in VSA patients compared to non-VSA patients, unlike newer drug-eluting stents (N-DES) or bare-metal stents (BMS).
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Interventional Cardiology
- Vascular Biology
Background:
- Vasospastic angina (VSA) significantly impacts patient prognosis after stent implantation, but the influence of stent type remains unclear.
- Understanding stent performance in VSA is crucial for optimizing treatment strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the impact of different stent types on clinical and angiographic outcomes in patients with and without vasospastic angina (VSA).
Main Methods:
- A comparative study evaluated 304 patients undergoing stent implantation, categorized by VSA status (positive or negative ergonovine testing) and stent type (bare-metal stent [BMS], sirolimus-eluting stent [SES], or newer generation drug-eluting stent [N-DES]).
- Primary outcomes included target lesion revascularization, target vessel revascularization, emergency coronary angiography, and cardiac death over 2 years.
- Angiographic follow-up assessed percent diameter stenosis.
Main Results:
- Sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) showed a significantly higher 2-year incidence of adverse outcomes in VSA patients compared to non-VSA patients (38.1% vs. 16.1%, P=0.03).
- VSA patients receiving SES also exhibited greater percent diameter stenosis at follow-up (10.0% vs. 2.3%, P=0.045).
- No significant differences in outcomes or stenosis were observed between VSA and non-VSA groups following implantation of bare-metal stents (BMS) or newer generation drug-eluting stents (N-DES).
Conclusions:
- The adverse impact of vasospastic angina (VSA) on clinical and angiographic outcomes is specific to sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) implantation.
- Bare-metal stents (BMS) and newer generation drug-eluting stents (N-DES) appear to mitigate the negative effects of VSA, suggesting improved stent selection for these patients.
Background:
Little is known about the impact of stent type on the prognosis of vasospastic angina (VSA) in patients who undergo stent implantation.
Methods And Results:
We evaluated consecutive patients undergoing coronary angiography with positive (n=650; VSA) and negative (n=2,872; non-VSA) ergonovine testing. Among them, 304 patients undergoing stent implantation for organic stenosis were classified for comparison into 3 respective VSA and non-VSA groups based on stent type (68 and 78 with bare-metal stent [BMS]; 21 and 49 with sirolimus-eluting stent [SES]; 26 and 62 with newer generation drug-eluting stent [N-DES]). The primary outcome was defined as target lesion revascularization, target vessel revascularization, emergency coronary angiography, and cardiac death. The 2-year cumulative incidence of the primary outcome was significantly higher in the VSA group than non-VSA group after SES implantation (38.1% vs. 16.1%, P=0.03), whereas there were no differences between the 2 groups after both BMS implantation and N-DES implantation. The difference in the percent diameter stenosis from mid-term to late-term follow-up was significantly higher in the VSA group than non-VSA group (10.0% vs. 2.3%, P=0.045) after SES implantation, whereas there were no differences between the 2 groups after both BMS implantation and N-DES implantation.
Conclusions:
The impact of VSA on clinical and angiographic outcomes was observed only in SES implantation, but not after N-DES or BMS implantation.
Related Concept Videos
Angina II: Classification
Angina IV: Management
Angina V: Nursing Management
Angina III: Clinical Manifestations and Assessment
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction

