Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 27, 2026

Laparoscopic Radical Gastrectomy for Remnant Gastric Cancer
05:30

Laparoscopic Radical Gastrectomy for Remnant Gastric Cancer

Published on: October 31, 2025

279

[R1 resection for gastric carcinoma].

K Ridwelski1,2, J Fahlke3, M Huß3

  • 1AN-Institut für Qualitätssicherung in der operativen Medizin an der Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg gGmbH, Leipziger Str. 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Deutschland. Karsten.Ridwelski@Klinikum-Magdeburg.de.

Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift Fur Alle Gebiete Der Operativen Medizen
|June 30, 2017
PubMed
Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Future emergence of new ecosystems caused by glacial retreat.

Nature·2023
Same author

Glacier retreat reorganizes river habitats leaving refugia for Alpine invertebrate biodiversity poorly protected.

Nature ecology & evolution·2023
Same author

Improved storage mitigates vulnerability to food-supply shocks in smallholder agriculture during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Global food security·2022
Same author

Mismatch repair deficiency, chemotherapy and survival for resectable gastric cancer: an observational study from the German staR cohort and a meta-analysis.

Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology·2022
Same author

[AKTIN - The German Emergency Department Data Registry - real-time data from emergency medicine : Implementation and first results from 15 emergency departments with focus on Federal Joint Committee's guidelines on acuity assessment].

Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin·2020
Same author

Author Correction: Global glacier mass changes and their contributions to sea-level rise from 1961 to 2016.

Nature·2020
Same journal

[S3 Guideline "Adult soft tissue sarcomas"].

Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen·2022
Same journal

[Synopsis-S3 guidelines pancreatic cancer].

Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen·2022
Same journal

[Laparoscopic sentinel node navigation surgery in gastric cancer to reduce surgical radicality].

Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen·2022
Same journal

[Future concepts for neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment of (resectable) pancreatic cancer].

Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen·2022
Same journal

[ASCO guidelines for the treatment of stage III NSCLC part 4: indications for adjuvant therapy].

Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen·2022
Same journal

[Surgical treatment of pancreatic cancer-What is new?]

Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen·2022
See all related articles
This summary is machine-generated.

R1 resection in gastric cancer worsens patient survival, particularly in early stages. Achieving R0 resection, often via frozen section or re-excision, is crucial for better outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Gastroenterology
  • Surgical Oncology
  • Pathology

Background:

  • R1 resection, defined as microscopic tumor at the surgical margin, negatively impacts long-term survival in resected gastric carcinoma.
  • The prognostic significance of R1 resection varies with tumor stage and lymph node involvement.
  • While R0 resection (no tumor at the margin) is ideal, R1 situations present challenges in gastric cancer surgery.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the literature on R1 resection in gastric cancer.
  • To analyze factors influencing R1 rates and their impact on patient survival.
  • To discuss current strategies for achieving R0 resection and the role of re-excision.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of studies reporting on R1 resection in gastric cancer.
Keywords:
Intraoperative frozen sectionLong-term survivalPrognosisReoperationRisk factors

More Related Videos

Robotics in Surgery: A Modular Robotic Platform Driven Gastric Wedge Resection
07:27

Robotics in Surgery: A Modular Robotic Platform Driven Gastric Wedge Resection

Published on: February 7, 2025

1.2K
Single Incision Plus One Port Laparoscopic Proximal Gastrectomy with Double Channel Anastomosis for Gastric Cancer Treatment
03:32

Single Incision Plus One Port Laparoscopic Proximal Gastrectomy with Double Channel Anastomosis for Gastric Cancer Treatment

Published on: December 27, 2024

1.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 27, 2026

Laparoscopic Radical Gastrectomy for Remnant Gastric Cancer
05:30

Laparoscopic Radical Gastrectomy for Remnant Gastric Cancer

Published on: October 31, 2025

279
Robotics in Surgery: A Modular Robotic Platform Driven Gastric Wedge Resection
07:27

Robotics in Surgery: A Modular Robotic Platform Driven Gastric Wedge Resection

Published on: February 7, 2025

1.2K
Single Incision Plus One Port Laparoscopic Proximal Gastrectomy with Double Channel Anastomosis for Gastric Cancer Treatment
03:32

Single Incision Plus One Port Laparoscopic Proximal Gastrectomy with Double Channel Anastomosis for Gastric Cancer Treatment

Published on: December 27, 2024

1.8K
  • Analysis of factors associated with increased R1 rates, including tumor size, stage, and histology.
  • Evaluation of the impact of R1 status on survival and the effectiveness of re-excision.
  • Main Results:

    • R1 resection significantly worsens prognosis, especially in early T stages with limited lymph node metastasis.
    • R1 resection rates are around 5% for gastric cancer and over 10% for esophagogastric junction adenocarcinomas.
    • Tumor size (>5 cm), advanced T/N stages, poor differentiation, and specific histologies increase R1 risk.
    • Intraoperative frozen section is standard for R0 achievement; re-excision is recommended if R1 is found postoperatively, though rarely performed.

    Conclusions:

    • Achieving R0 resection is critical for improving gastric cancer patient survival.
    • While re-excision after R1 detection can improve outcomes, it is infrequently utilized.
    • Further evidence is needed regarding the role of adjuvant therapies in R1 resection cases.