Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 27, 2026

07:53
Author Spotlight: Advancing 3D Modeling for Enhanced Diagnosis and Treatment of Pulmonary Nodules in Early-Stage Lung Cancer
Published on: October 13, 2023
2.2K
Estimation of lung tumor position from multiple anatomical features on 4D-CT using multiple regression analysis
Tomohiro Ono1, Mitsuhiro Nakamura1, Yoshinori Hirose2
1Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
|June 30, 2017
Summary
This study developed regression models to estimate lung tumor position from 4D-CT scans. The multiple regression analysis (MRA) approach significantly improved accuracy and reduced internal target volume (ITV) for lung cancer radiotherapy.
Area of Science:
- Radiotherapy
- Medical Imaging
- Computational Anatomy
Background:
- Accurate lung tumor localization is critical for effective stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT).
- Four-dimensional computed tomography (4D-CT) captures respiratory motion but requires precise internal target volume (ITV) definition.
- Traditional ITV definition can be time-consuming and may overestimate tumor margins.
Purpose of the Study:
- To estimate lung tumor position using single regression analysis (SRA) and multiple regression analysis (MRA) on 4D-CT data.
- To evaluate the impact of SRA and MRA on ITV for lung SBRT.
- To compare the accuracy of tumor position estimation using different regression approaches.
Main Methods:
- Utilized 4D-CT data from 12 lung cancer cases with >5 mm tumor motion.
- Measured 3D tumor position and anatomical features (lung volume, diaphragm, chest/abdominal walls).
- Estimated tumor position via SRA and MRA, calculating root-mean-square error (RMSE) and comparing ITVs to conventional methods.
Main Results:
- Multiple regression analysis (MRA) demonstrated higher accuracy (RMSE within 1.6 mm) compared to single regression analysis (SRA) (RMSE within 3.7 mm).
- Lung volume was the most influential anatomical feature in MRA.
- MRA and SRA approaches reduced ITV by an average of 38.3% and 31.9%, respectively, compared to conventional ITV.
Conclusions:
- MRA provides a more accurate estimation of lung tumor position than SRA.
- Both SRA and MRA significantly reduce ITV, potentially minimizing radiation dose to healthy tissues.
- These regression-based approaches offer a promising method for improving lung SBRT planning.

