Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Life Histories01:29

Life Histories

23.0K
Overview
23.0K
Carbon Skeletons01:12

Carbon Skeletons

116.2K
Life on Earth is carbon-based, as all macromolecules that make up living organisms contain carbon atoms. All organic compounds have a carbon backbone. Each carbon atom is tetravalent and can bond with four other atoms, making it an extraordinarily flexible component of biological molecules. Because carbon’s valence electrons are stable, it rarely becomes an ion. As the carbon chain increases in length, structural modifications such as ring structures, double bonds, and branching side...
116.2K
Altruism01:03

Altruism

47.9K
Altruistic behaviors are “unselfish” behaviors—those that help another individual at the expense of the individual carrying out the behavior. Despite the negative consequences for the altruistic animal, these behaviors are thought to have evolved for several reasons.
47.9K
The Scientific Method01:32

The Scientific Method

273.2K
The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
273.2K
The Scientific Method02:40

The Scientific Method

66.3K
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
66.3K
The Scientific Method03:50

The Scientific Method

69.8K
Chemistry is an empirical science. Scientists often pose questions to understand the chemistry in everyday life and seek answers to these questions. To achieve this, scientists follow a definitive series of steps that together make up the Scientific Method. This approach involves making observations, asking questions, building a hypothesis, conducting experiments, analyzing results, and forming a conclusion. 
69.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Adolescent Blood Pressure and Cardiovascular Disease Before Age 50 Years.

Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979)·2026
Same author

Uric Acid Variability Is Associated with Poor Prognosis in Heart Failure.

Journal of clinical medicine·2026
Same author

Change in blood pressure following transcatheter aortic valve implantation: predictors and association with prognosis.

Journal of hypertension·2026
Same author

Exploring the Association Between Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder and Essential Hypertension in a Pediatric Population.

Children (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Gender and Sex Conscious Medicine and the future direction of health care: An invited scientific review by the European Board and College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (EBCOG).

European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology·2025
Same author

Obesity and Cardiovascular Disease: Mechanistic Insights and Nutritional Management Strategies.

Nutrients·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 27, 2026

BioMEMS and Cellular Biology: Perspectives and Applications
16:30

BioMEMS and Cellular Biology: Perspectives and Applications

Published on: October 1, 2007

10.2K

[SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS: ON HONORS AND GHOSTS].

Marek Glezerman1,2,3, Ehud Grossman1,2,4

  • 1Ethics Committee.

Harefuah
|June 30, 2017
PubMed
Summary

Disputes over scientific publication authorship are common. This ethics committee addresses honorary and ghost authorship to ensure fair credit for researchers and clinicians.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Ethics
  • Scientific Publishing
  • Academic Research

Background:

  • The Sackler Faculty of Medicine ethics committee primarily handles disputes concerning scientific publication authorship.
  • These authorship issues arise from the pressure to publish (
  • Publish or Perish
  • ) for career advancement, funding, and knowledge dissemination.
  • Lack of pre-agreed authorship criteria often leads to conflicts.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the types and prevalence of authorship disputes reaching the ethics committee.
  • To examine the ethical implications of honorary and ghost authorship in scientific publications.
  • To highlight the role of established guidelines in resolving authorship conflicts.

Main Methods:

More Related Videos

BioMEMS: Forging New Collaborations Between Biologists and Engineers
07:26

BioMEMS: Forging New Collaborations Between Biologists and Engineers

Published on: November 1, 2007

8.7K
Establishing an Octopus Ecosystem for Biomedical and Bioengineering Research
09:10

Establishing an Octopus Ecosystem for Biomedical and Bioengineering Research

Published on: September 22, 2021

3.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 27, 2026

BioMEMS and Cellular Biology: Perspectives and Applications
16:30

BioMEMS and Cellular Biology: Perspectives and Applications

Published on: October 1, 2007

10.2K
BioMEMS: Forging New Collaborations Between Biologists and Engineers
07:26

BioMEMS: Forging New Collaborations Between Biologists and Engineers

Published on: November 1, 2007

8.7K
Establishing an Octopus Ecosystem for Biomedical and Bioengineering Research
09:10

Establishing an Octopus Ecosystem for Biomedical and Bioengineering Research

Published on: September 22, 2021

3.3K
  • Review of case studies presented to the ethics committee.
  • Analysis of common authorship disputes, including honorary and ghost authorship.
  • Application of existing guidelines from journals, institutions, and editor committees.

Main Results:

  • The majority of complaints involve disputed authorship, specifically honorary authorship (undeserved credit) and ghost authorship (uncredited contributions).
  • These disputes stem from inadequate planning and unclear authorship agreements.
  • Established guidelines provide a framework for addressing these ethical challenges.

Conclusions:

  • Authorship disputes are a significant ethical concern in scientific publishing.
  • Clear authorship agreements and adherence to guidelines are crucial for preventing conflicts.
  • The ethics committee plays a vital role in resolving authorship-related grievances.