Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Types of Reports I: Hands-off Report01:25

Types of Reports I: Hands-off Report

1.6K
A hand-off report, also known as a change-of-shift report, is a crucial nursing process that ensures the smooth transition of patient care responsibilities between nursing staff.
Following are the key components and categories of hand-off reports:
Purpose and Process:
1.6K
Methods of Documentation V: CBE01:23

Methods of Documentation V: CBE

1.5K
Charting by Exception, or CBE, is a method of documentation used in healthcare, particularly in nursing, that focuses on documenting only significant or abnormal findings rather than recording every detail. This approach aims to streamline the documentation process, improve efficiency, and ensure that healthcare providers can quickly identify deviations from normalcy in patient assessments.
In CBE, healthcare professionals establish predefined standards of practice that define what constitutes...
1.5K
Halo Effect01:27

Halo Effect

563
The halo effect is a cognitive bias in which an individual's overall impression influences judgments about their specific traits. This psychological phenomenon leads people to associate positive characteristics with those they perceive as generally good and negative characteristics with those they view as bad. This effect is particularly influential in social perception, professional evaluations, and decision-making processes.The Psychological Basis of the Halo EffectThe halo effect is rooted...
563
SBAR I: Understanding the Concept01:29

SBAR I: Understanding the Concept

6.2K
Effective communication among healthcare professionals during hand-off reporting is essential to delivering safe and continuous patient care. Common professional interactions include reports to healthcare team members, hand-off, and transfer reports. Nurses routinely report information to other healthcare team members and also urgently contact healthcare providers to report changes in patient status.
Standardized methods of communication have been developed to ensure that information is...
6.2K
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

489
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
489
SBAR II: Application of SBAR01:14

SBAR II: Application of SBAR

6.3K
SBAR is an effective communication tool used by healthcare professionals to communicate patient information accurately. SBAR stands for Situation, Background, Assessment, and Recommendation. For a better understanding, an example is given below.
SBAR Report from a Nurse to a Health Care Provider
S: "Hello, Dr. Smith. This is Jane, RN, from the Med Surg unit. I am calling to tell you about Ms. White in Room 210, who is experiencing increased pain and redness at her incision site. Her recent...
6.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Trial informed consent forms, the Declaration of Helsinki and the SPIRIT 2025 statement.

Clinical trials (London, England)·2026
Same author

Research Misconduct in Academia: Examining the Views of Academics in a Public University in Ghana.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
Same author

Why Should People with Lived Experience Be Included in the DSM Revision Process?

The Hastings Center report·2026
Same author

Trump's statements about acetaminophen and the problem of epistemic corrections.

BMJ evidence-based medicine·2026
Same author

Response to "Response to 'Is the UDN N-of-1 Enterprise Ethically Justifiable?'".

AMA journal of ethics·2025
Same author

Public Health Policymaking Outside of the Federal Government: Reflections on Authority and Trust-Building Challenges.

American journal of public health·2025
Same journal

Defending the Ethical Permissibility of Laryngeal Transplantation.

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2026
Same journal

A Framework of Institutional Obligations for Pragmatic Clinical Trials.

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2026
Same journal

Should Adherence to Medical Recommendations Be a Requirement for Kidney Transplant Candidacy?

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2026
Same journal

How "America First" Abandoned Global Health: The Case for an African Model.

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2026
Same journal

Carrots and Sticks: Incentives in Shaping Digital Health Products.

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2026
Same journal

From Empowerment to Offloading: Task Shifting and the Redistribution of Responsibility in Digital Health.

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 27, 2026

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

1.8K

Rethinking the Belmont Report?

Phoebe Friesen1, Lisa Kearns1, Barbara Redman1

  • 1a NYU School of Medicine.

The American Journal of Bioethics : AJOB
|June 30, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The Belmont Report, foundational for human subject research ethics, faces challenges from evolving biomedical research. Its principles may need updating to address modern complexities and community harms.

Keywords:
Belmont Reportautonomybeneficencehuman subjects researchjusticeresearch ethics

More Related Videos

Hydra, a Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Cardiovascular Analysis and Diagnosis
07:51

Hydra, a Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Cardiovascular Analysis and Diagnosis

Published on: September 26, 2018

8.1K
A Modified Lean and Release Technique to Emphasize Response Inhibition and Action Selection in Reactive Balance
07:19

A Modified Lean and Release Technique to Emphasize Response Inhibition and Action Selection in Reactive Balance

Published on: March 19, 2020

6.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 27, 2026

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

1.8K
Hydra, a Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Cardiovascular Analysis and Diagnosis
07:51

Hydra, a Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Cardiovascular Analysis and Diagnosis

Published on: September 26, 2018

8.1K
A Modified Lean and Release Technique to Emphasize Response Inhibition and Action Selection in Reactive Balance
07:19

A Modified Lean and Release Technique to Emphasize Response Inhibition and Action Selection in Reactive Balance

Published on: March 19, 2020

6.4K

Area of Science:

  • Bioethics
  • Human Subject Research
  • Research Ethics

Background:

  • The Belmont Report, published in 1979, established core ethical principles for human subject research.
  • It aimed to address ethical failures in past research, such as the Tuskegee Syphilis Study.
  • Key principles include respect for persons, beneficence, and justice.

Observation:

  • Modern biomedical research presents new ethical dilemmas not fully anticipated by the Belmont Report.
  • The boundary between clinical practice and research has become increasingly blurred.
  • Research complexity, commodification, and community-specific harms pose significant challenges.

Findings:

  • The report's principle of respect for persons may not adequately protect communities from unique harms.
  • Transparency has become critically important due to research commodification and complexity.
  • While protecting vulnerable populations is crucial, the report's application in contemporary research is debated.

Implications:

  • The Belmont Report's ethical framework may be insufficient for current biomedical research.
  • Revisions or new guidelines may be necessary to address the evolving landscape of human subject research.
  • Ongoing critical reflection on research ethics is essential for protecting participants and communities.