Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 27, 2026

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
Published on: February 16, 2011
Framing Health Equity: US Health Disparities in Comparative Perspective
Julia F Lynch1, Isabel M Perera1
1University of Pennsylvania.
This study reveals significant variations in how the US, UK, and France define health equity and its causes. While social determinants are acknowledged, policy documents rarely propose the extensive redistribution needed to address health inequalities.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Health Policy Analysis
- Sociology of Health
Background:
- Health equity is a critical global health concern.
- Understanding national policy approaches to health equity is essential for targeted interventions.
- Previous research indicates variations in how countries conceptualize and address health disparities.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically analyze and compare conceptions of health equity in national health policy documents from the United States, United Kingdom, and France.
- To identify differences in the characterization of health inequalities and their theorized causes across these nations.
- To assess the extent to which policy documents advocate for structural changes to address root causes of health inequities.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review of key national health policy documents from the US, UK, and France.
- Qualitative analysis of document content focusing on definitions of health equity, identification of disparities (by SES, race/ethnicity, territory), and attributed causes of health inequalities.
- Comparative analysis across the three countries.
Main Results:
- Substantial cross-national differences were observed in how health equity is conceptualized.
- Characterizations of group differences and theorized causes of health inequalities varied significantly.
- While social determinants of health were minimally acknowledged as a cause, policy documents generally stopped short of recommending the necessary redistribution of power and resources.
Conclusions:
- National health policy documents in the US, UK, and France present distinct approaches to health equity.
- There is a consistent gap between acknowledging social determinants of health and advocating for the structural reforms needed to achieve health equity.
- Future policy recommendations should consider more robust strategies for addressing the root causes of health inequalities.
More Related Videos
06:55Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
14:43A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Methods Of Healthcare Delivery System
Managed Care System:
The managed care system is designed to control the cost while maintaining the quality of care. The patient's care from admission to discharge is planned by the primary care provider or the case manager, also known as the gatekeeper. In a managed care system, the number of care providers is...
Equity Theory
Introduction To Health Care Delivery System
The Institute of Medicine (IOM) advocates for a patient-centered, effective, safe, timely, equitable, and effective healthcare system. The National Priorities...
Dimensions of Health and Illness
Primary Healthcare Services
In 1978, international leaders convened in Alma-Ata, Kazakhstan, for what would be a pivotal event in global health. The Alma-Ata Declaration was the first to call...
Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention I
The health belief model (HBM) attempts to predict health-related behavior in specific belief patterns. According to the HBM, a person's...