Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Receiver Operating Characteristic Plot01:15

Receiver Operating Characteristic Plot

519
A ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) plot is a graphical tool used to assess the performance of a binary classification model by illustrating the trade-off between sensitivity (true positive rate) and specificity (false positive rate). By plotting sensitivity against 1 - specificity across various threshold settings, the ROC curve shows how well the model distinguishes between classes, with a curve closer to the top-left corner indicating a more accurate model. The area under the ROC curve...
519
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

8.6K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
8.6K
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test01:00

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

7.1K
When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...
7.1K
Errors In Hypothesis Tests01:14

Errors In Hypothesis Tests

6.1K
When performing a hypothesis test, there are four possible outcomes depending on the actual truth (or falseness) of the null hypothesis and the decision to reject or not.
6.1K
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

636
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
636
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring01:25

Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring

1.6K
Blood pressure monitoring is a crucial clinical procedure in diagnosing and managing various cardiovascular conditions. Despite its significance, the accuracy of blood pressure measurements can be compromised by multiple factors, potentially leading to either falsely high or low readings. These inaccuracies are critical as they can significantly impact patient care. So, it is vital to understand these challenges deeply and adopt strategic approaches to minimize errors.
Several factors...
1.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Video game engines as the new "virtual" Skinner box.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior·2026
Same author

Exercise Improves Alzheimer's Disease Phenotype in the TgF344-AD Rat, a Behavioral Time Course Study of Males and Females.

Brain sciences·2025
Same author

Maximizing within-session stability in individual differences during an experiential impulsivity task.

Learning & behavior·2025
Same author

Early adolescent second-generation antipsychotic exposure produces long-term, post-treatment increases in body weight and metabolism-associated gene expression.

Pharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior·2024
Same author

We Live in Interesting Times: Introduction to the Special Section on Big Data & Behavior Science.

Perspectives on behavior science·2024
Same author

Understanding Individual Subject Differences through Large Behavioral Datasets: Analytical and Statistical Considerations.

Perspectives on behavior science·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 27, 2026

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
06:16

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease

Published on: August 9, 2024

995

Optimal go/no-go ratios to maximize false alarms.

Michael E Young1, Steven C Sutherland2, Anthony W McCoy3

  • 1Department of Psychological Sciences, Kansas State University, 492 Bluemont Hall, Manhattan, KS, 66506-5302, USA. michaelyoung@ksu.edu.

Behavior Research Methods
|July 1, 2017
PubMed
Summary

This study optimized go/no-go task parameters to increase false alarms, a key measure in behavioral inhibition research. Shorter intervals, specific go/no-go ratios, and varied go stimuli yielded the most false alarms.

Keywords:
EEGInhibitionOptimal designSelf-controlSignal detection theorygo/no-go

More Related Videos

Management of Respiratory Motion Artefacts in 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography using an Amplitude-Based Optimal Respiratory Gating Algorithm
06:53

Management of Respiratory Motion Artefacts in 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography using an Amplitude-Based Optimal Respiratory Gating Algorithm

Published on: July 23, 2020

6.2K
High-throughput Analysis of Mammalian Olfactory Receptors: Measurement of Receptor Activation via Luciferase Activity
12:02

High-throughput Analysis of Mammalian Olfactory Receptors: Measurement of Receptor Activation via Luciferase Activity

Published on: June 2, 2014

13.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 27, 2026

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
06:16

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease

Published on: August 9, 2024

995
Management of Respiratory Motion Artefacts in 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography using an Amplitude-Based Optimal Respiratory Gating Algorithm
06:53

Management of Respiratory Motion Artefacts in 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography using an Amplitude-Based Optimal Respiratory Gating Algorithm

Published on: July 23, 2020

6.2K
High-throughput Analysis of Mammalian Olfactory Receptors: Measurement of Receptor Activation via Luciferase Activity
12:02

High-throughput Analysis of Mammalian Olfactory Receptors: Measurement of Receptor Activation via Luciferase Activity

Published on: June 2, 2014

13.0K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Behavioral Science

Background:

  • Go/no-go tasks are widely used to study behavioral inhibition.
  • Limited research exists on how task design influences response classes, particularly false alarms.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify optimal go/no-go task parameters for maximizing false alarm production.
  • To provide empirical evidence for designing tasks that elicit specific behavioral responses.

Main Methods:

  • Empirical investigation of go/no-go task design characteristics.
  • Systematic variation of go/no-go ratio, intertrial interval (ITI), and number of go stimuli types.
  • Measurement of false alarm rates under different conditions.

Main Results:

  • The shortest intertrial intervals (450 ms) significantly increased false alarms.
  • Intermediate go/no-go ratios (2:1 to 4:1) were optimal for false alarm generation.
  • Employing multiple types of go stimuli also enhanced false alarm rates.

Conclusions:

  • Task design parameters critically influence false alarm rates in go/no-go tasks.
  • Specific conditions (short ITI, intermediate ratios, varied go stimuli) can be used to maximize false alarms.
  • Findings inform the design of behavioral inhibition studies and understanding of learning-related behavioral changes.