Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 27, 2026

Comprehensive & Cost Effective Laboratory Monitoring of HIV/AIDS: an African Role Model
Published on: October 31, 2010
Continuous quality improvement intervention for adolescent and young adult HIV testing services in Kenya improves HIV
Anjuli D Wagner1, Cyrus Mugo, Shay Bluemer-Miroite
1aDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA bDepartment of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya cInternational Training and Education Center for Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA dVCT and HIV Prevention Unit/Youth Centre, Kenyatta National Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya eSchool of Medicine fDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA gResearch and Programs, Kenyatta National Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya hDepartment of Psychosocial and Community Health iDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Objectives:
To determine whether continuous quality improvement (CQI) improves quality of HIV testing services for adolescents and young adults (AYA).
Design:
CQI was introduced at two HIV testing settings: Youth Centre and Voluntary Counseling and Testing (VCT) Center, at a national referral hospital in Nairobi, Kenya.
Methods:
Primary outcomes were AYA satisfaction with HIV testing services, intent to return, and accurate HIV prevention and transmission knowledge. Healthcare worker (HCW) satisfaction assessed staff morale. T tests and interrupted time series analysis using Prais-Winsten regression and generalized estimating equations accounting for temporal trends and autocorrelation were conducted.
Results:
There were 172 AYA (Youth Centre = 109, VCT = 63) during 6 baseline weeks and 702 (Youth Centre = 454, VCT = 248) during 24 intervention weeks. CQI was associated with an immediate increase in the proportion of AYA with accurate knowledge of HIV transmission at Youth Centre: 18 vs. 63% [adjusted risk difference (aRD) 0.42,95% confidence interval (CI) 0.21 to 0.63], and a trend at VCT: 38 vs. 72% (aRD 0.30, 95% CI -0.04 to 0.63). CQI was associated with an increase in the proportion of AYA with accurate HIV prevention knowledge in VCT: 46 vs. 61% (aRD 0.39, 95% CI 0.02-0.76), but not Youth Centre (P = 0.759). In VCT, CQI showed a trend towards increased intent to retest (4.0 vs. 4.3; aRD 0.78, 95% CI -0.11 to 1.67), but not at Youth Centre (P = 0.19). CQI was not associated with changes in AYA satisfaction, which was high during baseline and intervention at both clinics (P = 0.384, P = 0.755). HCW satisfaction remained high during intervention and baseline (P = 0.746).
Conclusion:
CQI improved AYA knowledge and did not negatively impact HCW satisfaction. Quality improvement interventions may be useful to improve adolescent-friendly service delivery.
Related Concept Videos
Sexually Transmitted Infections
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Primary Healthcare Services
In 1978, international leaders convened in Alma-Ata, Kazakhstan, for what would be a pivotal event in global health. The Alma-Ata Declaration was the first to call...
Levels of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention
In primary prevention, actions taken before disease onset prevent the disease from...
Health Literacy

