Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 27, 2026

A Coregistered Ultrasound and Photoacoustic Imaging Protocol for the Transvaginal Imaging of Ovarian Lesions
Published on: March 3, 2023
Complex US adnexal masses during pregnancy: Is pelvic MR imaging accurate for characterization?
Isabelle Thomassin-Naggara1, Benjamin Fedida1, Elisabeth Sadowski2
1Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpital Tenon, Service d'Imagerie, 4 rue de la Chine, Paris, France.
Objective:
To retrospectively evaluate the accuracy of pelvic magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for the characterization of complex sonographic adnexal masses discovered in women during pregnancy.
Study Design:
The study population comprised 31 pregnant women (median age: 32 years (range: 19-42); mean gestation age of 16 weeks) referred to our institution for MR imaging for characterization of an adnexal mass discovered incidentally during routine ultrasound (US) for other indications. The population comprised of 31 women, with 36 adnexal lesions (mean size: 103mm [range: 20-290]), of which 27 were benign and 9 were malignant masses. Prospective US and MR reports were reviewed to determine the presence of a benign or malignant lesion. Two radiologists (R1 and R2) blinded to the final outcome, retrospectively evaluated the MR images using the criteria based on the ADNEXMR-SCORE and classified the lesion as benign or malignant. The reference standard was surgical pathology or at least a 1-year imaging follow-up.
Results:
Prospective US and MR imaging correctly identified the diagnosis in 27/36 (75%) (95% confidence interval (CI): 58.9%-86.2%) and in 32/36 (88.9%) (95% CI: 74.6%-95.6%) of lesions, respectively. MR imaging with ADNEXMR-SCORE allowed a correct diagnosis in 32/36 (88.9%) (95% CI: 74.6%-95.6%) of lesions for R1 and in 30/36 (83.3%) (95% CI: 68.1%-92.1%) of lesions for R2. The sensitivities and specificities of MR imaging using the MR ADNEXMR-SCORE were 100% (95% CI: 70.1%-1000%) for both readers and 85.1% (95% CI: 67.5%-94%) and 77.7% (95% CI: 59.2%-89.4%) for R1 and R2, respectively. No malignancy was classified as benign using MR criteria. The reproducibility between the two readers was almost perfect, with a kappa of 0.914.
Conclusion:
MR imaging is highly accurate for the characterization of complex adnexal masses incidentally discovered during pregnancy.
Clinical Relevance:
MR imaging can accurately characterize adnexal masses in pregnancy and could be useful in opting for expectant management until delivery.
More Related Videos
07:44Non-Invasive Ultrasound Assessment of Endometrial Cancer Progression in Pax8-Directed Deletion of the Tumor Suppressors Arid1a and Pten in Mice
Published on: February 17, 2023
07:04A Novel Use of Three-dimensional High-frequency Ultrasonography for Early Pregnancy Characterization in the Mouse
Published on: October 24, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies IV: Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Ultrasonography
During an ultrasonography procedure, a handheld device called...
Imaging Studies II: Ultrasonography
Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography
Assessment of the Abdomen III: Palpation