Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 27, 2026

06:32
Coronoid-Temporalis Pedicled Flap for Orbital Floor Defect Reconstruction
Published on: December 5, 2025
765
Reconstruction of Cutaneous Nasal Defects
Gregory S Dibelius1, Dean M Toriumi1
1Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Eye and Ear Infirmary, University of Illinois-Chicago, 1855 W Taylor St Chicago Room. 2.42 Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
Facial Plastic Surgery Clinics of North America
|July 6, 2017
Summary
Mohs surgery is standard for skin cancer. Reconstructing nose defects requires careful planning using various techniques to preserve form and function for optimal results.
Area of Science:
- Dermatology
- Plastic Surgery
- Surgical Oncology
Background:
- Mohs micrographic surgery is the gold standard for treating skin cancer.
- Reconstruction of nasal defects after Mohs surgery presents unique challenges.
- Maintaining nasal form and function is paramount in reconstruction.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review reconstructive techniques for nasal defects post-Mohs surgery.
- To highlight the importance of a subunit approach in planning nasal reconstruction.
- To discuss factors influencing successful outcomes in nasal reconstruction.
Main Methods:
- Review of established reconstructive options for nasal defects.
- Discussion of advantages and disadvantages of each technique.
- Emphasis on the subunit principle for aesthetic and functional restoration.
Main Results:
- A spectrum of reconstructive options exists, including secondary intent, primary closure, skin grafts, local flaps, and interpolated flaps.
- Each technique offers specific benefits and drawbacks.
- A subunit approach facilitates surgical planning and improves results.
Conclusions:
- Nasal reconstruction after Mohs surgery requires careful consideration of multiple techniques.
- The subunit approach is a valuable tool for achieving optimal aesthetic and functional outcomes.
- Postoperative care and judicious use of adjunctive procedures enhance results.

