Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 27, 2026

A Modified Sonographic Algorithm for Image Acquisition in Life-Threatening Emergencies in the Critically Ill Newborn
Published on: April 7, 2023
Validation of different pediatric triage systems in the emergency department
Kanokwan Aeimchanbanjong1, Uthen Pandee1
1Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Insights
The Ramathibodi Triage System (RTS) showed excellent reliability in pediatric emergency departments. The Emergency Severity Index (ESI) demonstrated the best validity for predicting patient admission, making it a suitable choice.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Emergency Medicine
- Healthcare Systems Analysis
- Clinical Triage Research
Background:
- Pediatric triage presents unique challenges due to children's distinct physiological and psychosocial responses to stressors.
- Determining the optimal triage system is crucial for effective pediatric emergency care.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate and compare the inter-rater reliability and validity of five distinct triage systems in a pediatric emergency setting.
- To identify the most effective triage system for pediatric patients.
Main Methods:
- A prospective observational study involving two phases.
- Phase I: Assessed inter-rater reliability of five triage systems (MTS, ESI v4, CTAS, ATS, RTS) among nurses and residents.
- Phase II: Evaluated triage system validity by comparing acuity levels with actual patient admission data for 1,041 children.
Main Results:
- The Ramathibodi Triage System (RTS) achieved almost perfect inter-rater reliability (kappa=1.0).
- The Emergency Severity Index (ESI) and Pediatric Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) demonstrated good inter-rater reliability (kappa=0.8-0.9).
- The ESI showed the highest predictive ability for admission (sensitivity 52%, specificity 81%, AUC 0.78).
Conclusions:
- RTS exhibits superior inter-rater reliability in pediatric triage.
- ESI and CTAS also show good inter-rater reliability.
- ESI demonstrates appropriate validity, making it a recommended triage system for pediatric emergency departments.
Background:
Triage system in children seems to be more challenging compared to adults because of their different response to physiological and psychosocial stressors. This study aimed to determine the best triage system in the pediatric emergency department.
Methods:
This was a prospective observational study. This study was divided into two phases. The first phase determined the inter-rater reliability of five triage systems: Manchester Triage System (MTS), Emergency Severity Index (ESI) version 4, Pediatric Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS), Australasian Triage Scale (ATS), and Ramathibodi Triage System (RTS) by triage nurses and pediatric residents. In the second phase, to analyze the validity of each triage system, patients were categorized as two groups, i.e., high acuity patients (triage level 1, 2) and low acuity patients (triage level 3, 4, and 5). Then we compared the triage acuity with actual admission.
Results:
In phase I, RTS illustrated almost perfect inter-rater reliability with kappa of 1.0 (P<0.01). ESI and CTAS illustrated good inter-rater reliability with kappa of 0.8-0.9 (P<0.01). Meanwhile, ATS and MTS illustrated moderate to good inter-rater reliability with kappa of 0.5-0.7 (P<0.01). In phase II, we included 1 041 participants with average age of 4.7±4.2 years, of which 55% were male and 45% were female. In addition 32% of the participants had underlying diseases, and 123 (11.8%) patients were admitted. We found that ESI illustrated the most appropriate predicting ability for admission with sensitivity of 52%, specificity of 81%, and AUC 0.78 (95%CI 0.74-0.81).
Conclusion:
RTS illustrated almost perfect inter-rater reliability. Meanwhile, ESI and CTAS illustrated good inter-rater reliability. Finally, ESI illustrated the appropriate validity for triage system.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
Drug Dosing: Infants and Children
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management

