Comparison of maternal and fetal complications in elective and emergency cesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 27, 2026
External Cephalic Version: Is it an Effective and Safe Procedure?
Published on: June 6, 2020
Xiao-Jing Yang1, Shan-Shan Sun2
1Department of Obstetrics, Tai'an Central Hospital, No. 29 Longtan Road, Tai'an, 271000, China. yxj3366@163.com.
Background:
Though the same types of complication were found in both elective cesarean section (ElCS) and emergence cesarean section (EmCS), the aim of this study is to compare the rates of maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality between ElCS and EmCS.
Methods:
Full-text articles involved in the maternal and fetal complications and outcomes of ElCS and EmCS were searched in multiple database. Review Manager 5.0 was adopted for meta-analysis, sensitivity analysis, and bias analysis. Funnel plots and Egger's tests were also applied with STATA 10.0 software to assess possible publication bias.
Results:
Totally nine articles were included in this study. Among these articles, seven, three, and four studies were involved in the maternal complication, fetal complication, and fetal outcomes, respectively. The combined analyses showed that both rates of maternal complication and fetal complication in EmCS were higher than those in ElCS. The rates of infection, fever, UTI (urinary tract infection), wound dehiscence, DIC (disseminated intravascular coagulation), and reoperation of postpartum women with EmCS were much higher than those with ElCS. Larger infant mortality rate of EmCS was also observed.
Conclusion:
Emergency cesarean sections showed significantly more maternal and fetal complications and mortality than elective cesarean sections in this study. Certain plans should be worked out by obstetric practitioners to avoid the post-operative complications.
