Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 27, 2026

Echocardiographic Evaluation of Atrial Communications before Transcatheter Closure
Published on: February 8, 2022
Lower Hospital Charges and Societal Costs for Catheter Device Closure of Atrial Septal Defects
Jessica N Sanchez1, Michael D Seckeler2
1College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Insights
Catheter closure for atrial septal defects (ASD) is significantly more cost-effective than surgical repair. This approach reduces hospital charges and societal costs, offering a substantial financial advantage.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Health Economics
- Pediatric Congenital Heart Disease
Background:
- Atrial septal defects (ASD) are common congenital heart anomalies.
- Interventional catheterization is increasingly used for ASD closure, necessitating cost analysis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare hospital charges and societal costs between surgical and catheter-based ASD closure in the U.S.
- To evaluate the economic implications of different ASD treatment modalities.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of the Kids' Inpatient Database (2010-2012).
- Inclusion of patients under 21 years undergoing isolated surgical or catheter ASD closure.
- Comparison of length of stay, hospital charges, and estimated societal costs.
Main Results:
- Surgical ASD closure had longer length of stay (3.6 days) versus catheter closure (1.3 days).
- Hospital charges were higher for surgical closure ($87,465) compared to catheter closure ($64,109).
- Total societal costs were significantly greater for surgical ASD closure ($90,000) than catheter closure ($64,966).
Conclusions:
- Catheter-based ASD closure presents a significant cost advantage over surgical closure in the U.S.
- Shorter length of stay and recovery contribute to the economic benefits of the catheter approach.
- Real-world data supports catheter closure as a more cost-effective strategy for ASD treatment.
Abstract:
Atrial septal defects (ASD) are among the most common congenital heart defects. As more ASDs are corrected by interventional catheterization instead of surgery, it is critical to understand the associated clinical and societal costs. The goal of this study was to use a national U.S. database to describe hospital charges and societal costs for surgical and catheter-based (ASD) closure. Retrospective review of hospital discharge data from the Kids' Inpatient Database from January 2010 to December 2012. The database was queried for admissions for <21 years old with ICD-9 procedure codes for surgical (35.51 or 35.61) or catheter (35.52) ASD closure; those with other cardiac conditions and/or additional cardiac procedures were excluded. Age, length of stay (LOS), and hospital charges and lost parental wages (societal costs) were compared between groups using t test or Mann-Whitney U test, as appropriate. Four hundred and eighty-six surgical and 305 catheter ASD closures were identified. LOS, hospital charges, and total societal costs were higher in surgical ASD compared to catheter ASD admissions (3.6 vs. 1.3 days, p < 0.001, $87,465 vs. $64,109, p < 0.001, and $90,000 vs. $64,966, p < 0.001, respectively). In this review of a large national inpatient database, we found that hospital and societal costs for surgical ASD closure are significantly higher than catheter ASD closure in the United States in the current era. Factors that likely contribute to this include longer LOS and longer post-operative recovery. Using "real-world" data, this study demonstrates a substantial cost advantage for catheter ASD closure compared to surgical.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Cardiac Catheterization II: Right Heart Catheterization
Cardiac Catheterization III: Left Heart Catheterization

