Lower Hospital Charges and Societal Costs for Catheter Device Closure of Atrial Septal Defects

Jessica N Sanchez1, Michael D Seckeler2

  • 1College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.

Insights

Catheter closure for atrial septal defects (ASD) is significantly more cost-effective than surgical repair. This approach reduces hospital charges and societal costs, offering a substantial financial advantage.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Health Economics
  • Pediatric Congenital Heart Disease

Background:

  • Atrial septal defects (ASD) are common congenital heart anomalies.
  • Interventional catheterization is increasingly used for ASD closure, necessitating cost analysis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare hospital charges and societal costs between surgical and catheter-based ASD closure in the U.S.
  • To evaluate the economic implications of different ASD treatment modalities.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of the Kids' Inpatient Database (2010-2012).
  • Inclusion of patients under 21 years undergoing isolated surgical or catheter ASD closure.
  • Comparison of length of stay, hospital charges, and estimated societal costs.

Main Results:

  • Surgical ASD closure had longer length of stay (3.6 days) versus catheter closure (1.3 days).
  • Hospital charges were higher for surgical closure ($87,465) compared to catheter closure ($64,109).
  • Total societal costs were significantly greater for surgical ASD closure ($90,000) than catheter closure ($64,966).

Conclusions:

  • Catheter-based ASD closure presents a significant cost advantage over surgical closure in the U.S.
  • Shorter length of stay and recovery contribute to the economic benefits of the catheter approach.
  • Real-world data supports catheter closure as a more cost-effective strategy for ASD treatment.