Revised PROPELLER for T2-weighted imaging of the prostate at 3 Tesla: impact on lesion detection and PI-RADS classification
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 27, 2026
A Cognitive Fusion-guided Prostate Biopsy Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transrectal Ultrasound
Published on: March 21, 2025
Michael Meier-Schroers1, Christian Marx2, Frederic Carsten Schmeel2
1Department of Radiology, University Hospital Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Str 25, 53127, Bonn, Germany. michael.meier@ukbonn.de.
Purpose:
To evaluate revised PROPELLER (RevPROP) for T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) of the prostate as a substitute for turbo spin echo (TSE).
Materials And Methods:
Three-Tesla MR images of 50 patients with 55 cancer-suspicious lesions were prospectively evaluated. Findings were correlated with histopathology after MRI-guided biopsy. T2 RevPROP, T2 TSE, diffusion-weighted imaging, dynamic contrast enhancement, and MR-spectroscopy were acquired. RevPROP was compared to TSE concerning PI-RADS scores, lesion size, lesion signal-intensity, lesion contrast, artefacts, and image quality.
Results:
There were 41 carcinomas in 55 cancer-suspicious lesions. RevPROP detected 41 of 41 carcinomas (100%) and 54 of 55 lesions (98.2%). TSE detected 39 of 41 carcinomas (95.1%) and 51 of 55 lesions (92.7%). RevPROP showed fewer artefacts and higher image quality (each p < 0.001). No differences were observed between single and overall PI-RADS scores based on RevPROP or TSE (p = 0.106 and p = 0.107). Lesion size was not different (p = 0.105). T2-signal intensity of lesions was higher and T2-contrast of lesions was lower on RevPROP (each p < 0.001).
Conclusion:
For prostate cancer detection RevPROP is superior to TSE with respect to motion robustness, image quality and detection rates of lesions. Therefore, RevPROP might be used as a substitute for T2WI.
Key Points:
• Revised PROPELLER can be used as a substitute for T2-weighted prostate imaging. • Revised PROPELLER detected more carcinomas and more suspicious lesions than TSE. • Revised PROPELLER showed fewer artefacts and better image quality compared to TSE. • There were no significant differences in PI-RADS scores between revised PROPELLER and TSE. • The lower T2-contrast of revised PROPELLER did not impair its diagnostic quality.
