Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Standards of Care I01:22

Standards of Care I

1.2K
Federal statutes profoundly impact nursing practice, providing critical guidelines to ensure patient care is equitable, accessible, and of the highest quality. The following laws address distinct aspects of healthcare provision and patient rights:
1.2K
Standards of Care II01:19

Standards of Care II

1.1K
Nurses bear specific legal responsibilities under several federal statutes, including:
1.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Response to correspondence on: "Neurolymphatic clearance in neurodegenerative disease: Emerging mechanisms and potential translational strategies".

JPRAS open·2026
Same author

Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the LYMPH-Q upper extremity module into French for patients with breast cancer-related lymphedema.

Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS·2026
Same author

Perforator Versus Non-perforator Flap for Perineal Reconstruction: Long-Term Comparison of Complications and Quality of Life.

Annals of surgical oncology·2026
Same author

ASO Visual Abstract: Perforator Versus Non-perforator Flap for Perineal Reconstruction-Long-Term Comparison of Complications and Quality of Life.

Annals of surgical oncology·2026
Same author

Long-term comparative effectiveness of microsurgical treatment options for lower limb lymphedema: Lymphovenous anastomosis vs. vascularized lymph node transfer.

Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS·2026
Same author

A Practical Algorithm for Donor- and Recipient-site Selection in Vascularized Lymph Node Transfer in Extremity Lymphedema.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open·2026
Same journal

Antibody-drug conjugates beyond HER2: Translating evidence into practice for HR+ HER2-negative and triple-negative metastatic breast cancer.

Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland)·2026
Same journal

Comment on comparator design in regional versus general anesthesia for ambulatory breast-conserving surgery.

Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland)·2026
Same journal

HER2DX genomic assay in HER2-positive early breast cancer treated with trastuzumab and pertuzumab: A correlative analysis from a real-world cohort.

Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland)·2026
Same journal

Patient satisfaction following Goldilocks mastectomy in non-obese women: A pilot study.

Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland)·2026
Same journal

Concerns about anesthetic standardization and interpretability in the comparison of regional anesthesia with dexmedetomidine versus general anesthesia.

Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland)·2026
Same journal

Translating CLEOPATRA into routine practice: National treatment patterns and survival for patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer.

Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 27, 2026

Single-Port Robotic-assisted Transaxillary Breast-conserving Surgery: A Prospective, Single-arm, Non-randomized Phase IIa Clinical Trial
03:07

Single-Port Robotic-assisted Transaxillary Breast-conserving Surgery: A Prospective, Single-arm, Non-randomized Phase IIa Clinical Trial

Published on: August 19, 2025

1.2K

Current standards in oncoplastic breast conserving surgery.

Walter P Weber1, Savas D Soysal1, Jasmin Zeindler1

  • 1Breast Center, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland; University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland)
|July 11, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Oncoplastic breast conserving surgery offers survival benefits for breast cancer patients but may increase complications. Further research is needed to confirm patient benefits and standardize surgical approaches.

Keywords:
Breast cancerBreast conserving surgeryOncoplastic surgery

More Related Videos

Endoscopic Bilateral Nipple-sparing Mastectomy via a Single Axillary Incision with Immediate Pre-pectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction
13:35

Endoscopic Bilateral Nipple-sparing Mastectomy via a Single Axillary Incision with Immediate Pre-pectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction

Published on: May 17, 2024

4.5K
Intraoperative Assessment of Resection Margins in Oral Cavity Cancer: This is the Way
04:45

Intraoperative Assessment of Resection Margins in Oral Cavity Cancer: This is the Way

Published on: May 10, 2021

4.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 27, 2026

Single-Port Robotic-assisted Transaxillary Breast-conserving Surgery: A Prospective, Single-arm, Non-randomized Phase IIa Clinical Trial
03:07

Single-Port Robotic-assisted Transaxillary Breast-conserving Surgery: A Prospective, Single-arm, Non-randomized Phase IIa Clinical Trial

Published on: August 19, 2025

1.2K
Endoscopic Bilateral Nipple-sparing Mastectomy via a Single Axillary Incision with Immediate Pre-pectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction
13:35

Endoscopic Bilateral Nipple-sparing Mastectomy via a Single Axillary Incision with Immediate Pre-pectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction

Published on: May 17, 2024

4.5K
Intraoperative Assessment of Resection Margins in Oral Cavity Cancer: This is the Way
04:45

Intraoperative Assessment of Resection Margins in Oral Cavity Cancer: This is the Way

Published on: May 10, 2021

4.5K

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Surgical Oncology
  • Breast Cancer Research

Background:

  • Oncoplastic breast conserving surgery (OPBCS) is a growing treatment modality for breast cancer.
  • Observational data suggest OPBCS provides high survival and low recurrence rates.
  • However, OPBCS is associated with a higher complication rate than conventional breast conserving surgery.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the established goals of OPBCS, including expanding breast conservation for larger tumors and enhancing aesthetic outcomes.
  • To assess the overall patient benefit, which remains under-confirmed.
  • To address the increasing demand for standardization in OPBCS for clinical research and practice.

Main Methods:

  • Review of observational evidence and existing literature on oncoplastic breast conserving surgery.
  • Analysis of recurrence rates, survival rates, and complication rates.
  • Examination of proposed classification systems and outcomes measurement tools.

Main Results:

  • Consistent evidence indicates low recurrence and high survival rates with OPBCS.
  • A higher rate of complications is observed compared to conventional breast conserving surgery.
  • Patient-reported benefits require further confirmation.

Conclusions:

  • OPBCS is a viable option for breast cancer treatment, offering oncological safety and improved aesthetics.
  • Standardization of OPBCS through universally accepted classification and outcome measures is crucial for future clinical research and practice.
  • Further studies are needed to fully elucidate patient benefits and optimize surgical techniques.