Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Unrealistic Optimism Bias01:30

Unrealistic Optimism Bias

276
Unrealistic optimism bias is the tendency to overestimate the likelihood of positive outcomes. This cognitive bias makes individuals believe they are less likely to experience failures, setbacks, or risks and more likely to succeed than others. For example, people may assume they are less prone to health issues, accidents, or financial struggles than their peers, even when they share similar risk factors.One key component of this bias is the above-average effect, where individuals perceive...
276
Confirmation Biases01:31

Confirmation Biases

8.4K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
8.4K
Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

25.9K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
25.9K
Humanistic Psychology01:24

Humanistic Psychology

2.9K
Humanistic psychology emerged in the mid-20th century as a response to the deterministic and pessimistic nature of behaviorism and psychoanalysis. While behaviorism focused on observable behaviors influenced by the environment and psychoanalysis delved into unconscious motivations, both theories suggested that human actions lacked free will. In contrast, humanistic psychology offers a perspective that emphasizes the innate potential for goodness and growth within every individual.
This approach...
2.9K
Social Proof00:52

Social Proof

32.4K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
32.4K
Naturalistic Observations02:30

Naturalistic Observations

17.8K
If you want to understand how behavior occurs, one of the best ways to gain information is to simply observe the behavior in its natural context. However, people might change their behavior in unexpected ways if they know they are being observed. How do researchers obtain accurate information when people tend to hide their natural behavior? As an example, imagine that your professor asks everyone in your class to raise their hand if they always wash their hands after using the restroom. Chances...
17.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Risk-Benefit of Phase 2 Monotherapy Trials in Adult Solid Cancers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

International journal of cancer·2026
Same author

Ten Questions for Ethics Committees Evaluating the Strength of Evidence in Support of Early Phase Trials.

Ethics & human research·2026
Same author

Meta-Analysis of Median Survival Times With Inverse-Variance Weighting.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same author

Planned time burden for patients participating in phase 2 cancer trials.

The oncologist·2026
Same author

Impact of keto leucine and isoleucine on CHO cell central carbon metabolism and performance in fed-batch and steady-state perfusion.

Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology·2026
Same author

Drug approvals in crowded drug classes potentially reflect efficacy overestimates and false positivity: A portfolio analysis of immune checkpoint inhibitor trials.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 27, 2026

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
06:42

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Published on: September 28, 2018

12.3K

The Research Optimist's Defense.

Daniel Benjamin, Jonathan Kimmelman

    Perspectives in Biology and Medicine
    |July 11, 2017
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Clinical researchers often overestimate scientific protocol success. This essay argues that such unrealistic optimism, despite potential defenses, raises significant moral concerns within the research community.

    More Related Videos

    Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios
    07:43

    Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios

    Published on: August 4, 2023

    2.8K
    Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
    06:45

    Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

    Published on: April 18, 2017

    6.6K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Feb 27, 2026

    Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
    06:42

    Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

    Published on: September 28, 2018

    12.3K
    Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios
    07:43

    Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios

    Published on: August 4, 2023

    2.8K
    Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
    06:45

    Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

    Published on: April 18, 2017

    6.6K

    Area of Science:

    • Clinical research ethics
    • Scientific methodology
    • Cognitive biases in research

    Background:

    • Clinical researchers frequently exhibit unrealistic optimism regarding scientific protocol success.
    • This optimism may affect treatment hypothesis confirmation and recruitment targets.
    • Overestimation of success is a documented cognitive bias in research settings.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate the normative question of whether unrealistic optimism in clinical research is harmful.
    • To critically examine common defenses of unrealistic optimism in scientific endeavors.
    • To explore the moral implications of widespread unrealistic optimism among researchers.

    Main Methods:

    • Philosophical essay examining ethical and normative arguments.
    • Analysis of five common defenses: agnosticism, skepticism, contrarianism, denialism, and fatalism.
    • Critical evaluation of the sufficiency of these defenses against moral concerns.

    Main Results:

    • Each of the five defenses (agnosticism, skepticism, contrarianism, denialism, fatalism) was found to be insufficient to resolve moral concerns.
    • Despite arguments for its benefits or inevitability, unrealistic optimism poses ethical challenges.
    • The study highlights the need for careful moral evaluation of this bias.

    Conclusions:

    • Community-wide unrealistic optimism in clinical research presents significant moral concerns.
    • Existing defenses do not adequately mitigate the ethical issues associated with this bias.
    • Further study and moral evaluation are needed to address unrealistic optimism in research.