Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 27, 2026

Composition and Distribution Analysis of Bioaerosols Under Different Environmental Conditions
Published on: January 7, 2019
Particle and bioaerosol characteristics in a paediatric intensive care unit
Congrong He1, Ian M Mackay2, Kay Ramsay3
1International Laboratory for Air Quality and Health, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), GPO Box 2434, Brisbane, Queensland 4001, Australia; Central Analytical Research Facility, Institute for Future Environment, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), GPO Box 2434, Brisbane, Queensland 4001, Australia.
Insights
Indoor air quality in paediatric intensive care units (PICUs) is crucial for vulnerable patients. This study found indoor particle concentrations were lower than outdoors, but specific activities like nebulization significantly increased them, posing infection risks.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Health
- Pediatric Critical Care
- Infectious Disease Control
Background:
- Paediatric intensive care units (PICUs) house vulnerable patients requiring specialized care.
- Limited data exists on indoor air quality (IAQ) and its influencing factors within PICUs.
- Understanding IAQ is vital for minimizing infection risks in critically ill children.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess indoor airborne particle concentrations and identify sources within a PICU.
- To evaluate the impact of specific medical activities on PICU air quality.
- To develop recommendations for mitigating aerosol generation and transmission.
Main Methods:
- Continuous indoor and outdoor airborne particle mass (PM10) and particle number (PN) measurements over two weeks.
- Collection and analysis of 82 bioaerosol samples for bacterial and viral pathogens.
- Identification of emission rates for key indoor particle sources like nebulization therapy.
Main Results:
- Indoor PM10 and PN concentrations were significantly lower than outdoor levels.
- Nebulization therapy, tracheal suction, and cleaning activities were identified as major indoor particle sources.
- Particles generated indoors were rapidly transported throughout the PICU, even between isolated rooms.
Conclusions:
- While outdoor air quality is generally better, indoor activities significantly impact PICU air quality.
- Specific interventions are needed to control aerosol generation from medical procedures.
- Recommendations for PICU design and staff practices can minimize infection risks.
Abstract:
The paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) provides care to critically ill neonates, infants and children. These patients are vulnerable and susceptible to the environment surrounding them, yet there is little information available on indoor air quality and factors affecting it within a PICU. To address this gap in knowledge we conducted continuous indoor and outdoor airborne particle concentration measurements over a two-week period at the Royal Children's Hospital PICU in Brisbane, Australia, and we also collected 82 bioaerosol samples to test for the presence of bacterial and viral pathogens. Our results showed that both 24-hour average indoor particle mass (PM10) (0.6-2.2μgm-3, median: 0.9μgm-3) and submicrometer particle number (PN) (0.1-2.8×103pcm-3, median: 0.67×103pcm-3) concentrations were significantly lower (p<0.01) than the outdoor concentrations (6.7-10.2μgm-3, median: 8.0μgm-3 for PM10 and 12.1-22.2×103pcm-3, median: 16.4×103pcm-3 for PN). In general, we found that indoor particle concentrations in the PICU were mainly affected by indoor particle sources, with outdoor particles providing a negligible background. We identified strong indoor particle sources in the PICU, which occasionally increased indoor PN and PM10 concentrations from 0.1×103 to 100×103pcm-3, and from 2μgm-3 to 70μgm-3, respectively. The most substantial indoor particle sources were nebulization therapy, tracheal suction and cleaning activities. The average PM10 and PN emission rates of nebulization therapy ranged from 1.29 to 7.41mgmin-1 and from 1.20 to 3.96pmin-1×1011, respectively. Based on multipoint measurement data, it was found that particles generated at each location could be quickly transported to other locations, even when originating from isolated single-bed rooms. The most commonly isolated bacterial genera from both primary and broth cultures were skin commensals while viruses were rarely identified. Based on the findings from the study, we developed a set of practical recommendations for PICU design, as well as for medical and cleaning staff to mitigate aerosol generation and transmission to minimize infection risk to PICU patients.
Related Concept Videos
Transmission-based Precautions II: Airborne and Protective Environment
Airborne precautions:
Use airborne precautions when treating patients known or suspected to have diseases that spread through the air—for example, tuberculosis or measles. These organisms are present in smaller droplets expelled by an infected person and...
Pneumonia I: Introduction
Risk Factors
Various factors influence the likelihood of developing pneumonia. Age plays a crucial role, with infants, children under two, and individuals over 65 at increased risk due to their...
Transmission-based Precautions I: Contact, Enteric, and Droplets
Contact Precautions:
Contact precautions are the measures taken to prevent the transmission of infectious agents, especially epidemiologically important microorganisms such as MRSA or influenza, primarily transmitted through direct or indirect contact with an...
Inhaled Medications

