Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 26, 2026
Author Spotlight: Genetically Engineered Mouse Models and Pathological Characterization of Neurofibromatosis Type 1 Associated Tumors
Published on: May 17, 2024
What are the differentiating clinical and MRI-features of enchondromas from low-grade chondrosarcomas?
Hassan Douis1,2, M Parry3, S Vaiyapuri4
1Department of Radiology, Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Birmingham, UK. douis.hassan@hotmail.co.uk.
Objectives:
To evaluate the role of clinical assessment, conventional and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in differentiating enchondromas from chondrosarcomas of long bone.
Methods:
The following clinical and MRI findings were assessed: age, gender, pain, pain attributable to lesion, tumour location, tumour length, presence, depth of endosteal scalloping, bone marrow oedema, soft tissue oedema, cortical destruction, periosteal reaction, bone expansion, macroscopic fat, calcification, soft tissue mass, haemorrhage, dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Clinical and MRI findings were compared with histopathological grading.
Results:
Sixty patients with central chondroid tumours were included (27 enchondromas, 10 cartilaginous lesions of unknown malignant potential, 15 grade 1 chondrosarcomas, 8 high-grade chondrosarcomas). Pain attributed to lesion, tumour length, endosteal scalloping > 2/3, cortical destruction, bone expansion and soft tissue mass were differentiating features between enchondromas and grade 1 chondrosarcomas. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI could not differentiate enchondromas from grade 1 chondrosarcomas.
Conclusions:
Previously reported imaging signs of chondrosarcomas are useful in the diagnosis of grade 1 lesions but have lower sensitivity than in higher grade lesions. Deep endosteal scalloping is the most sensitive imaging sign of grade 1 chondrosarcomas. Pain due to the lesion is an important clinical sign of grade 1 chondrosarcomas. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI is not useful in differentiating enchondromas from grade 1 chondrosarcomas.
Key Points:
• Differentiation of enchondroma from low-grade chondrosarcoma is challenging for radiologists and pathologists. • The utility of clinical assessment, conventional and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI was uncertain. • Clinical assessment and conventional MRI aid in differentiating enchondromas from low-grade chondrosarcoma. • Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI cannot differentiate enchondromas from grade 1 chondrosarcoma.
