Prenatal management of fetal intrapericardial teratoma: a systematic review
Ahmed A Nassr1,2, Sherif A Shazly3, Shaine A Morris4
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine and Texas Children's Fetal Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Insights
This systematic review examines prenatal management for fetal pericardial teratoma. Prenatal interventions show potential benefits, but outcomes require careful consideration due to associated risks.
Area of Science:
- Perinatology
- Fetal Medicine
- Pediatric Surgery
Background:
- Fetal pericardial teratoma is a rare congenital tumor.
- Management strategies and outcomes require further elucidation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To comprehensively review the clinical course, perinatal outcomes, and effectiveness of prenatal management for fetal pericardial teratoma.
Main Methods:
- Systematic literature search of Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Scopus up to September 2016.
- Inclusion of studies reporting prenatal course of pericardial teratoma in singleton or twin gestations.
- Data abstraction by two independent reviewers using standardized forms.
Main Results:
- 67 fetuses with pericardial teratoma were identified across 59 studies.
- Prenatal intervention was performed in 26 fetuses, with 75% favorable outcomes in those who were hydropic.
- In the non-intervention group, 30.8% of hydropic fetuses had a favorable outcome.
Conclusions:
- Prenatal interventions like fluid drainage have been used for intrapericardial teratoma.
- Neonatal benefit of pericardiocentesis is uncertain; other interventions show variable success.
- Prenatal intervention may be considered in specialized centers, balancing maternal and fetal risks.
Objectives:
The purpose of this systematic review is to provide a comprehensive overview on the clinical course, perinatal outcome, and effectiveness of prenatal management options for pericardial teratoma.
Methods:
A comprehensive search including Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, and Scopus was conducted from inception to September 2016. All studies that reported the prenatal course of pericardial teratoma in singleton or twin gestations were considered eligible. Standardized forms were used for data abstraction by two independent reviewers.
Results:
Out of 217 screened abstracts, 59 studies reporting 67 fetuses with pericardial teratoma were included. Twenty-three singleton fetuses and 3 fetuses in twin gestations underwent prenatal treatment, and 20 (76.9%) of them were hydropic at the time of intervention. Of those, 15/20 (75%) had a favorable outcome. In the non-intervention group (n = 41), 26 (63.4%) developed hydrops, and out of those, 8 (30.8%) had a favorable outcome.
Conclusion:
Prenatal fluid drainage and other prenatal techniques have been utilized in the treatment of intrapericardial teratoma. While most fetuses tolerated pericardiocentesis, the neonatal benefit of this procedure is still uncertain, and outcomes of other interventions had variable success. Prenatal intervention for pericardial teratoma may be an option in specialized units but, given the maternal and fetal risks, needs careful consideration. © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
More Related Videos
05:46Introduction of Intracapsular Rotary-cut Procedures IRCP: A Modified Hysteromyomectomy Procedures Facilitating Fertility Preservation
Published on: January 17, 2019
05:08Targeted and Selective Treatment of Pluripotent Stem Cell-derived Teratomas Using External Beam Radiation in a Small-animal Model
Published on: February 17, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Pericarditis III: Medical Management
Teratogenicity
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Mitral Valve Prolapse III: Nursing Management
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
