Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Genome Size and the Evolution of New Genes03:21

Genome Size and the Evolution of New Genes

9.3K
While every living organism has a genome of some kind (be it RNA, or DNA), there is considerable variation in the sizes of these blueprints. One major factor that impacts genome size is whether the organism is prokaryotic or eukaryotic. In prokaryotes, the genome contains little to no non-coding sequence, such that genes are tightly clustered in groups or operons sequentially along the chromosome. Conversely, the genes in eukaryotes are punctuated by long stretches of non-coding sequence.
9.3K
Genome Size and the Evolution of New Genes03:21

Genome Size and the Evolution of New Genes

3.5K
3.5K
Exon Recombination02:32

Exon Recombination

4.2K
The evolution of new genes is critical for speciation. Exon recombination, also known as exon shuffling or domain shuffling, is an important means of new gene formation. It is observed across vertebrates, invertebrates, and in some plants such as potatoes and sunflowers. During exon recombination, exons from the same or different genes recombine and produce new exon-intron combinations, which might evolve into new genes. 
Exon shuffling follows “splice frame rules.” Each exon...
4.2K
Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?02:05

Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?

8.3K
The genomes of eukaryotes are punctuated by long stretches of sequence which do not code for proteins or RNAs. Although some of these regions do contain crucial regulatory sequences, the vast majority of this DNA serves no known function. Typically, these regions of the genome are the ones in which the fastest change, in evolutionary terms, is observed, because there is typically little to no selection pressure acting on these regions to preserve their sequences.
In contrast, regions which code...
8.3K
Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?02:05

Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?

3.8K
3.8K
Conservation of Protein Domains Over Different Proteins02:26

Conservation of Protein Domains Over Different Proteins

14.8K
Protein domains are small structurally independent units that are part of a single amino acid chain.  Although these domains are often structurally independent, they may rely on synergistic effects to perform their functions as part of a larger protein. Protein domains may be conserved within the same organism, as well as across different organisms.
A limited set of protein domains often duplicate and recombine during evolution. These domains can be organized in different combinations to...
14.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Purified zymogens reveal mechanisms of snake venom metalloproteinase auto-activation.

eLife·2026
Same author

Canonical PKCα-immunoreactive rod bipolar cells are present in nocturnal snakes but not in diurnal snakes.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

From scarcity to sustainability: Policy pathways for equitable snakebite antivenom access in Africa.

PLOS global public health·2026
Same author

Identification of DC-174 as a Novel Hydroxamic Precandidate for the Development of an Oral Snakebite Treatment.

Journal of medicinal chemistry·2026
Same author

Biochemical characterisation and substrate-specific proteolytic diversity of venom metalloproteinases in African puff adders.

Toxicon: X·2026
Same author

Heparin-incorporated whey protein isolate-derived hydrogels with an intended dual function as snakebite wound dressings and drug delivery systems inhibit spitting cobra venom-induced cytotoxicity.

Toxicon : official journal of the International Society on Toxinology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 26, 2026

Extraction of Venom and Venom Gland Microdissections from Spiders for Proteomic and Transcriptomic Analyses
10:25

Extraction of Venom and Venom Gland Microdissections from Spiders for Proteomic and Transcriptomic Analyses

Published on: November 3, 2014

34.7K

Evolution: Gene Co-option Underpins Venom Protein Evolution.

Nicholas R Casewell1

  • 1Alistair Reid Venom Research Unit, Parasitology Department, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool L3 5QA, UK.

Current Biology : CB
|July 12, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Parasitoid wasp venom toxins evolve through gene co-option, not duplication. This suggests gene co-option is a key driver of new protein functions.

More Related Videos

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations
04:52

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations

Published on: February 3, 2023

1.4K
High Throughput Quantitative Expression Screening and Purification Applied to Recombinant Disulfide-rich Venom Proteins Produced in E. coli
12:16

High Throughput Quantitative Expression Screening and Purification Applied to Recombinant Disulfide-rich Venom Proteins Produced in E. coli

Published on: July 30, 2014

24.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 26, 2026

Extraction of Venom and Venom Gland Microdissections from Spiders for Proteomic and Transcriptomic Analyses
10:25

Extraction of Venom and Venom Gland Microdissections from Spiders for Proteomic and Transcriptomic Analyses

Published on: November 3, 2014

34.7K
Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations
04:52

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations

Published on: February 3, 2023

1.4K
High Throughput Quantitative Expression Screening and Purification Applied to Recombinant Disulfide-rich Venom Proteins Produced in E. coli
12:16

High Throughput Quantitative Expression Screening and Purification Applied to Recombinant Disulfide-rich Venom Proteins Produced in E. coli

Published on: July 30, 2014

24.9K

Area of Science:

  • Evolutionary biology
  • Molecular biology
  • Biochemistry

Background:

  • Venoms are complex mixtures of bioactive proteins.
  • Understanding toxin evolution is crucial for biochemistry and evolutionary studies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the evolutionary mechanisms behind parasitoid wasp venom toxins.
  • To determine if gene co-option or gene duplication is the primary driver of venom toxin evolution.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative genomics analysis of venom-producing genes.
  • Phylogenetic analysis to trace gene origins.
  • Functional assays to assess protein activity.

Main Results:

  • Parasitoid wasp venom toxins primarily evolve via gene co-option.
  • Evidence suggests co-option precedes functional diversification.
  • The canonical gene duplication model is less prevalent for these toxins.

Conclusions:

  • Gene co-option is a significant, underappreciated mechanism for protein neofunctionalization in venom systems.
  • This finding impacts our understanding of molecular evolution and toxin development.