Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 26, 2026

A Simplified Stepwise Approach to Echo Guidance during Percutaneous Mitral Valve Repair
Published on: October 16, 2021
Clinical and Echocardiographic Outcomes Following Permanent Pacemaker Implantation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve
Divyanshu Mohananey1, Yash Jobanputra2, Arnav Kumar2
1From the Department of Hospital Medicine (D.M., A.K.), Department of Cardiovascular Medicine (Y.J., A.K., J.M.W., S.R.K.), and Department of Cadiothoracic Surgery (S.M.), Cleveland Clinic, OH. mohanad@ccf.org.
Insights
Permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) does not increase mortality or stroke risk. However, PPM is linked to reduced recovery of left ventricular ejection fraction post-TAVR.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Cardiac Surgery
Background:
- Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a primary treatment for aortic stenosis in high-risk patients.
- Conduction abnormalities are common post-TAVR, often necessitating permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation.
- The clinical impact of PPM implantation after TAVR remains debated.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effect of PPM implantation on clinical and echocardiographic outcomes after TAVR.
- To summarize existing data using meta-analysis techniques.
- To clarify the risks and benefits associated with PPM implantation post-TAVR.
Main Methods:
- Meta-analysis of relevant studies.
- Summarized dichotomous variables using Mantel-Haenszel relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
- Assessed continuous variables using standardized mean difference and 95% CIs; evaluated heterogeneity with Higgins I² statistic.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, or stroke at 30 days and 1 year between patients with and without PPM.
- Similar rates of all-cause mortality (RR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.92-1.16) and cardiovascular mortality (RR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.39-1.24) at 1 year.
- Significantly greater improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction observed in patients without PPM (SMD, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.12-0.32).
Conclusions:
- PPM implantation after TAVR is not associated with increased short- or long-term risks of mortality, stroke, or myocardial infarction.
- PPM implantation is associated with impaired recovery of left ventricular ejection fraction following TAVR.
- These findings provide crucial insights into the management of conduction abnormalities after TAVR.
Background:
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement has become the procedure of choice for inoperable, high-risk, and many intermediate-risk patients with aortic stenosis. Conduction abnormalities are a common finding after transcatheter aortic valve replacement and often result in permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation. Data pertaining to the clinical impact of PPM implantation are controversial. We used meta-analysis techniques to summarize the effect of PPM implantation on clinical and echocardiographic outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
Methods And Results:
Data were summarized as Mantel-Haenszel relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for dichotomous variables and as standardized mean difference and 95% CI for continuous variables We used the Higgins I2 statistic to evaluate heterogeneity. We found that patients with and without PPM have similar all-cause mortality (RR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.70-1.03), cardiovascular mortality (RR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.59-1.18), myocardial infarction (RR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.20-1.11), and stroke (RR, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.70-2.26) at 30 days. The groups were also comparable in all-cause mortality (RR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.92-1.16), cardiovascular mortality (RR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.39-1.24), myocardial infarction (RR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.30-1.13), and stroke (RR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.47-1.04) at 1 year. We observed that the improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction was significantly greater in the patients without PPM (standardized mean difference, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.12-0.32).
Conclusions:
PPM implantation is not associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, stroke, or myocardial infarction both at short- and long-term follow-up. However, PPM is associated with impaired left ventricular ejection fraction recovery post-transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
Related Concept Videos
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Mitral Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Mitral Valve Prolapse II: Assessment and Management
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management

