Differences in the risk of cardiovascular disease for movers and stayers in New Zealand: a survival analysis
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 26, 2026

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
Published on: October 23, 2020
Frances Darlington-Pollock1, Nichola Shackleton2, Paul Norman3
1Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Objectives:
To explore if risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) for participants who moved before their first CVD event is higher than for stayers, and examine whether the relationship is moderated by ethnicity.
Methods:
The sample comprised 2,068,360 New Zealand residents enrolled in any Primary Health Organisation, aged between 30 and 84 years, had complete demographic information, and no prior history of CVD. Cox proportional regression was used to compare CVD risk between movers and stayers. The analysis was conducted for the whole sample and stratified by ethnicity.
Results:
The combined analysis suggested that movers have a lower risk of CVD than stayers. This is consistent for all ethnic groups with some variation according to experience of deprivation change following residential mobility.
Conclusions:
Although mobile groups may have a higher risk of CVD than immobile groups overall, risk of CVD in the period following a residential mobility event is lower than for stayers. Results are indicative of a short-term healthy migrant effect comparable to that observed for international migrants.
Related Concept Videos
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Assumptions of Survival Analysis
Relative Risk
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Cancer Survival Analysis
Introduction To Survival Analysis
The primary goal of survival analysis is to estimate survival time—the time...

