Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 26, 2026

An Experimental Paradigm for the Prediction of Post-Operative Pain PPOP
Published on: January 27, 2010
Interventions for postoperative pain in children: An overview of systematic reviews
Krste Boric1, Svjetlana Dosenovic2, Antonia Jelicic Kadic3
1Laboratory for Pain Research, University of Split School of Medicine, Split, Croatia.
Insights
This overview of systematic reviews found inconclusive evidence for most pediatric postoperative pain management strategies. More high-quality trials are needed to confirm the efficacy and safety of various interventions.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Anesthesiology
- Pain Management
- Evidence-Based Medicine
Background:
- Postoperative pain in children requires effective and safe management strategies.
- Numerous interventions exist, but their efficacy and safety require robust summarization.
- Systematic reviews provide a foundation for evaluating these interventions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To conduct an overview of systematic reviews on the efficacy and safety of postoperative pain management in children.
- To synthesize evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on various pain management strategies.
- To identify gaps in the evidence and guide future research.
Main Methods:
- Searched multiple databases (Cochrane, CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE, PsycINFO) up to January 2016.
- Included 45 systematic reviews evaluating interventions for pediatric postoperative pain.
- Assessed the methodological quality of included systematic reviews.
Main Results:
- 19 (42%) systematic reviews presented conclusive evidence of efficacy for interventions like diclofenac, ketamine, and epidural analgesia.
- 14 (31%) systematic reviews reported conclusive safety data for interventions including dexmedetomidine and transversus abdominis plane block.
- Most systematic reviews had medium methodological quality; Cochrane reviews were of higher quality.
Conclusions:
- Evidence for the efficacy and safety of most pediatric postoperative pain management interventions remains inconclusive.
- There is a significant need for more rigorous, high-quality randomized controlled trials.
- This overview highlights the current limitations in evidence and directs future research efforts.
Abstract:
The aim of this study was to conduct an overview of systematic reviews that summarizes the results about efficacy and safety from randomized controlled trials involving the various strategies used for postoperative pain management in children. We searched the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, CINAHL, Database of Reviews of Effect, Embase, MEDLINE, and PsycINFO from the earliest date to January 24, 2016. This overview included 45 systematic reviews that evaluated interventions for postoperative pain in children. Out of 45 systematic reviews that investigated various interventions for postoperative pain in children, 19 systematic reviews (42%) presented conclusive evidence of efficacy. Positive conclusive evidence was reported in 18 systematic reviews (40%) for the efficacy of diclofenac, ketamine, caudal analgesia, dexmedetomidine, music therapy, corticosteroid, epidural analgesia, paracetamol, and/or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and transversus abdominis plane block. Only one systematic review reported conclusive evidence of equal efficacy that involved a comparison of dexmedetomidine vs morphine and fentanyl. Safety of interventions was reported as conclusive in 14 systematic reviews (31%), with positive conclusive evidence for dexmedetomidine, corticosteroid, epidural analgesia, transversus abdominis plane block, and clonidine. Seven systematic reviews reported equal conclusive safety for epidural infusion, diclofenac intravenous vs ketamine added to opioid analgesia, bupivacaine, ketamine, paracetamol, and dexmedetomidine vs intravenous infusions of various opioid analgesics, oral suspension and suppository of diclofenac, only opioid, normal saline, no treatment, placebo, and midazolam. Negative conclusive statement for safety was reported in one systematic review for caudal analgesia vs noncaudal regional analgesia. More than half of systematic reviews included in this overview were rated as having medium methodological quality. Of 45 included systematic reviews, 10 were Cochrane reviews and they had higher methodological quality than non-Cochrane reviews. As evidence concerning efficacy and safety is inconclusive for most of the analyzed interventions, our review points out the need for more rigorous trials concerning pain management in children.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management
Analgesia and Pain Management
General Anesthesia: Overview
General anesthesia induces unconsciousness in the whole body, while the others target specific areas or sensations. It is administered to minimize adverse effects, maintain...
Parenteral Anesthetics: Overview
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Epidural Anesthesia
Since epidural anesthetics can be infused through an epidural catheter, all types of drugs, including short-acting ones, can be administered. Chloroprocaine and lidocaine are examples of short and long-duration anesthetics, respectively. Bupivacaine...
Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...

