Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 26, 2026

5/6 Nephrectomy Using Sharp Bipolectomy Via Midline Laparotomy in Rats
Published on: April 4, 2025
Challenges in conducting clinical trials in nephrology: conclusions from a Kidney Disease-Improving Global Outcomes
Colin Baigent1, William G Herrington2, Josef Coresh3
1Medical Research Council Population Health Research Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Clinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit (CTSU), Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Abstract:
Despite the high costs of treatment of people with kidney disease and associated comorbid conditions, the amount of reliable information available to guide the care of such patients is very limited. Some treatments have been assessed in randomized trials, but most such trials have been too small to detect treatment effects of a magnitude that would be realistic to achieve with a single intervention. Therefore, KDIGO convened an international, multidisciplinary controversies conference titled "Challenges in the Conduct of Clinical Trials in Nephrology" to identify the key barriers to conducting trials in patients with kidney disease. The conference began with plenary talks focusing on the key areas of discussion that included appropriate trial design (covering identification and evaluation of kidney and nonkidney disease outcomes) and sensible trial execution (with particular emphasis on streamlining both design and conduct). Break out group discussions followed in which the key areas of agreement and remaining controversy were identified. Here we summarize the main findings from the conference and set out a range of potential solutions. If followed, these solutions could ensure future trials among people with kidney disease are sufficiently robust to provide reliable answers and are not constrained by inappropriate complexities in design or conduct.
Insights
Conducting clinical trials for kidney disease patients is challenging due to limited reliable information and small trial sizes. Solutions are proposed to improve trial design and execution for robust evidence in nephrology research.
Area of Science:
- Nephrology
- Clinical Trials
- Medical Research
Background:
- Limited reliable information exists for treating kidney disease and comorbid conditions.
- Existing randomized trials are often too small to detect meaningful treatment effects.
Framework:
- International multidisciplinary conference on challenges in nephrology clinical trials.
- Focused discussions on appropriate trial design, including kidney and non-kidney outcomes.
- Addressed sensible trial execution, emphasizing streamlined design and conduct.
Implementation:
- Identified key barriers in conducting clinical trials for kidney disease patients.
- Facilitated breakout group discussions to pinpoint areas of agreement and controversy.
- Summarized main findings and proposed potential solutions.
Implications:
- Proposed solutions aim to ensure future kidney disease trials are robust.
- Enhanced trial robustness will provide reliable answers for patient care.
- Streamlined design and conduct will mitigate inappropriate complexities in nephrology research.
Related Concept Videos
Chronic Kidney Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Chronic Kidney Disease II: Clinical Manifestations
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Acute Kidney Injury IV: Diagnostic Studies and Prevention
Chronic Kidney Disease IV: Nursing Management
Renal Drug Clearance: Overview
Renal clearance can be calculated using different methods. One approach is to divide the urinary drug excretion rate by the plasma drug concentration. This method directly measures renal clearance, indicating the kidneys' efficiency in...

