Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Self-Discrepancy Theory02:45

Self-Discrepancy Theory

19.0K
One influential perspective on what motivates people's behavior is detailed in Tory Higgin's self-discrepancy theory (Higgins, 1987). He proposed that people hold disagreeing internal representations of themselves that lead to different emotional states.  
19.0K
Self-Discrepancy and Its Effects01:29

Self-Discrepancy and Its Effects

366
Self-discrepancy theory explains how people compare their actual self to their ideal and ought selves and how mismatches between these self-guides can lead to emotional distress. Developed by E. Tory Higgins, the theory distinguishes among three components of self-concept: the actual self, the ideal self, and the ought self. These refer respectively to how individuals perceive themselves, how they aspire to be, and how they believe they are obligated to be. Emotional well-being, self-esteem,...
366
Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect01:26

Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect

278
The similarity-dissimilarity effect, a fundamental concept in social psychology, explains how interpersonal similarities and differences influence attraction and social interactions. This effect is supported by three key psychological perspectives: balance theory, social comparison theory, and consensual validation.Balance Theory and Cognitive ConsistencyBalance theory, developed by Fritz Heider, posits that individuals seek cognitive consistency in their relationships. When two people share...
278
Deindividuation00:57

Deindividuation

31.0K
Deindividuation is a form of social influence on an individual’s behavior such that the individual engages in unusual or non-normal behavior while in a group setting. Why? Because in these group settings, the individual no longer sees themselves as an individual anymore, disinhibiting their behavior and personal restraint.
31.0K
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

8.6K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
8.6K
Frustration and Conflict: Approach-Approach, Approach-Avoidance01:20

Frustration and Conflict: Approach-Approach, Approach-Avoidance

592
Frustration occurs when people are obstructed or prevented from achieving a desired goal or fulfilling a perceived need. For example, when someone's input is ignored in a discussion, it can lead to feelings of frustration. Conflict, however, arises from opposing interests, goals, or actions. Conflicts can take various forms based on the nature of these opposing desires or goals.
One common type of conflict is the Approach–Approach Conflict. In this case, a person faces two desirable...
592

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Alzheimer's disease proteome-wide association study implicates adaptive immunity and identifies risk genes LILRB1 and SIRPA.

Science translational medicine·2026
Same author

Deficient processing of regularity violations during visuospatial neglect: a visual mismatch negativity study.

Neuropsychologia·2026
Same author

Modeling digital technology use with light self-administration: Conceptual challenges and alternative interpretations.

Journal of behavioral addictions·2026
Same author

A two-process account of event-related potentials to stimuli violating sequential regularity? Comment on Harenbrock, Schlossmacher et al. (2026) paper.

Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews·2026
Same author

Automatic pairing of real-world stimuli in younger and older adults: An event-related potential study.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Revisiting object contextual cueing: A replication study on implicit learning.

Acta psychologica·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 26, 2026

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
07:34

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

18.0K

Visual mismatch negativity (vMMN) for low- and high-level deviances: A control study.

Domonkos File1,2,3, Bálint File4,5, Flóra Bodnár6,7,4

  • 1Department of Cognitive Psychology, Eötvös Loránd University, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Budapest, Hungary. file.domonkos@ttk.mta.hu.

Attention, Perception & Psychophysics
|July 16, 2017
PubMed
Summary

This study differentiates genuine visual mismatch negativity (gvMMN) from stimulus-specific adaptation (SSA) in visual processing. Results show that stimulus complexity influences whether gvMMN or SSA explains brain activity.

Keywords:
Evoked potentialsVisual perception

More Related Videos

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
07:12

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

993
Operant Procedures for Assessing Behavioral Flexibility in Rats
08:30

Operant Procedures for Assessing Behavioral Flexibility in Rats

Published on: February 15, 2015

21.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 26, 2026

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
07:34

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

18.0K
Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
07:12

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

993
Operant Procedures for Assessing Behavioral Flexibility in Rats
08:30

Operant Procedures for Assessing Behavioral Flexibility in Rats

Published on: February 15, 2015

21.7K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Visual Perception

Background:

  • Distinguishing genuine visual mismatch negativity (gvMMN) from stimulus-specific adaptation (SSA) is crucial for understanding visual processing.
  • Previous studies often failed to adequately control for SSA when investigating vMMN.
  • The influence of stimulus complexity on these neural processes remains unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To isolate the neural correlates of gvMMN from SSA using controlled visual paradigms.
  • To investigate how stimulus complexity affects the neural responses to deviant visual stimuli.
  • To clarify the underlying mechanisms of vMMN and SSA in visual oddball tasks.

Main Methods:

  • Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded in response to nonattended visual stimuli under various control conditions.
  • Stimuli included line textures and windmill patterns of varying complexity (e.g., 4, 6, or 12 vanes).
  • Source localization of brain activity was performed using the sLORETA inverse solution.

Main Results:

  • In simple line texture stimuli, stimulus-specific adaptation (SSA) fully accounted for the observed ERP effects.
  • Complex windmill patterns (12 vanes) elicited genuine visual mismatch negativity (gvMMN), indicated by posterior negativities.
  • Less complex windmill patterns (6 vanes) showed ERP effects explained by SSA, even when presented infrequently.
  • Deviant stimuli with a greater complexity difference from frequent stimuli elicited stronger deviant-related responses.

Conclusions:

  • The neural processes underlying visual mismatch negativity (vMMN) are not uniform and are significantly influenced by stimulus complexity.
  • Stimulus-specific adaptation (SSA) plays a substantial role in processing repeated visual stimuli, and its contribution must be carefully controlled for in vMMN research.
  • The complexity difference between frequent and infrequent stimuli critically impacts the detection and neural representation of visual deviancy.