Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 26, 2026

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework
Published on: July 24, 2016
Mapping social-ecological vulnerability to inform local decision making.
Lauric Thiault1,2,3,4, Paul Marshall5,6, Stefan Gelcich4
1National Center for Scientific Research, PSL Research University, CRIOBE USR 3278 CNRS-EPHE-UPVD, Paris, France.
Mapping social-ecological vulnerability helps manage natural resources. This study operationalizes a spatial tool to identify high-priority areas for conservation and minimize social impacts in local fisheries.
Area of Science:
- Environmental science
- Conservation biology
- Social-ecological systems analysis
Background:
- Integrating human-nature relationships into decision-making tools for natural resource management and biodiversity conservation is challenging.
- Social-ecological vulnerability frameworks help understand human-nature linkages but lack operational tools for local-scale spatial representation.
- Existing approaches often focus on single vulnerability components, potentially overlooking critical social-ecological interactions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and apply a method for mapping social-ecological vulnerability at local scales.
- To identify social-ecological vulnerability hotspots in a small-scale fishery.
- To provide a spatially explicit tool to inform conservation and management decisions.
Main Methods:
- Developed a mapping method for social-ecological vulnerability using human-nature dependencies and ecosystem services data.
- Applied the method to the Moorea, French Polynesia small-scale fishery.
- Combined spatially explicit indicators of exposure, sensitivity, and adaptive capacity for both reef fish assemblages and fishing households.
Main Results:
- Social and ecological vulnerabilities varied significantly across the study area.
- Identified social-ecological vulnerability hotspots where both social and ecological subsystems exhibited high vulnerability.
- Demonstrated spatial heterogeneity in vulnerability sources, highlighting areas needing targeted management interventions.
Conclusions:
- Operationalizing social-ecological vulnerability mapping provides valuable insights for local-scale sustainability management.
- The approach highlights the importance of considering both social and ecological dimensions of vulnerability for effective conservation planning.
- The developed method can inform biodiversity conservation strategies and minimize negative social impacts of management decisions.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Applications of GIS: Disaster Management and Emergency Response
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment
Manipulation and Analysis
Impact of Social Context on Individuals
Levels of Use of a GIS
Dimensions of Health and Illness

