Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 26, 2026

Author Spotlight: Obtaining High-Quality CSF and Blood Samples for Epilepsy Biomarker Discovery
Published on: September 1, 2023
Methodological issues associated with clinical trials in epilepsy
Edoardo Ferlazzo1,2, Chiara Sueri1, Sara Gasparini1,2
1a Regional Epilepsy Centre , Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli Hospital , Reggio Calabria , Italy.
Introduction:
despite methodological advances in epilepsy clinical trials, the proportion of patients reaching seizure-freedom has not substantially changed over the years. We review the main methodological limitations of current trials, the possible strategies to overcome these limits, and the issues that need to be addressed in next future. Area covered: references were identified by PubMed search until March 2017 and unpublished literature was searched on ClinicalTrials.gov. Add-on trials mainly involve refractory epilepsy subjects, reducing overall response to the investigational drug. The inclusion of subjects with earlier disease from less developed countries has partially allowed overcoming this limitation, but has introduced more random variability of results. Monotherapy trials rise methodological, economical, and ethical concerns with different regulatory requirements in European Union and in the United States of America. Newer trial designs, such as futility trials or 'time-to-event' design, have been implemented. Moreover, both add-on and monotherapy trials results might be affected by patient's ability to recognize and record seizures, and by randomness of seizures occurrence over time. Possible strategies to achieve more reliable outcomes are detailed. Expert commentary: clinical trial methodology needs to be optimized to better address regulatory agencies requirements and to encounter both patients' and clinicians' needs.
Insights
Epilepsy clinical trial success rates remain stagnant despite advances. Optimizing trial methodology is crucial for meeting regulatory requirements and patient needs in epilepsy research.
Area of Science:
- Clinical trial methodology
- Epilepsy research
- Regulatory science
Background:
- Epilepsy clinical trials have seen methodological advances, yet patient seizure-freedom rates have not significantly improved.
- Current add-on trials often include refractory epilepsy patients, potentially limiting drug response.
- Monotherapy trials face methodological, economic, and ethical challenges, with differing regulatory standards between the EU and US.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review methodological limitations in current epilepsy clinical trials.
- To explore strategies for overcoming these limitations and identify future research needs.
- To enhance the reliability of epilepsy clinical trial outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Literature search of PubMed up to March 2017 and ClinicalTrials.gov for unpublished studies.
- Analysis of add-on and monotherapy trial designs and their inherent limitations.
- Review of newer trial designs like futility and time-to-event studies.
Main Results:
- Add-on trials may be limited by patient selection (refractory epilepsy) and variability from diverse populations.
- Monotherapy trials present complex regulatory and ethical considerations.
- Patient-reported outcomes and seizure occurrence randomness can impact trial results.
Conclusions:
- Clinical trial methodology requires optimization to better align with regulatory demands and the needs of patients and clinicians.
- Addressing limitations in patient selection, outcome assessment, and trial design is essential for advancing epilepsy treatment.
- Improved trial designs and strategies are necessary to achieve more robust and reliable outcomes in epilepsy research.
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Epilepsy and Seizures: Overview
Various factors can trigger epilepsy, including genetic factors, brain damage, metabolic causes, and unknown etiology. Diagnosis of epilepsy involves electroencephalography (EEG), which...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Electroconvulsive Therapy
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Antiepileptic Drugs: Potassium Channel Activators
Ezogabine has gained approval as an adjunctive treatment...

