Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 26, 2026

Bedside Ultrasound for Guiding Fluid Removal in Patients with Pulmonary Edema: The Reverse-FALLS Protocol
Published on: July 28, 2018
Blood volume-monitored regulation of ultrafiltration to decrease the dry weight in fluid-overloaded hemodialysis
Marlies Antlanger1, Peter Josten2, Michael Kammer3
1Department of Medicine III, Clinical Division of Nephrology & Dialysis, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Regulation of ultrafiltration and temperature (UTR) reduced dialysis complications compared to conventional methods. However, rapid fluid removal is challenging, requiring careful consideration for improving dialysis outcomes and patient volume status.
Area of Science:
- Nephrology
- Cardiorenal Medicine
- Dialysis Technology
Background:
- Chronic fluid volume overload is a significant risk factor for mortality in hemodialysis patients.
- Effective management of extracellular fluid volume (ECV) is crucial for improving patient outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy of blood-volume monitored regulation of ultrafiltration and dialysate conductivity (UCR) and regulation of ultrafiltration and temperature (UTR) against conventional dialysis (CONV) in facilitating dry weight reduction.
- To assess the impact of these methods on dialysis complications and blood pressure management.
Main Methods:
- A multicenter, 4-week randomized controlled trial involving hemodialysis patients with ≥15% ECV overload.
- Patients were randomized to UCR, UTR, or CONV, with initial rapid dry weight reduction.
- Primary outcome: intra- and postdialytic complications; Secondary outcomes: dry weight and blood pressure reduction.
Main Results:
- The UTR group showed a significantly lower rate of complications compared to CONV and UCR.
- UTR also achieved significantly greater dry weight reduction compared to UCR, but not CONV.
- Higher ultrafiltration rates were observed in UTR, despite similar dialysis times; technical errors were noted in 36% of UCR sessions.
Conclusions:
- Fluid removal remains challenging even with advanced techniques in volume-overloaded patients.
- UTR demonstrated a relative advantage in reducing complications, though caution is advised due to technical issues with UCR.
- Rapid fluid removal should be approached cautiously, emphasizing the need for careful management of volume status to enhance dialysis outcomes.
Related Concept Videos
Hemodialysis III: Nursing Management
Hemodialysis II: Procedure and Complications
Acute Kidney Injury V: Interprofessional Care
Regulation of Water Output
Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy
Acute Kidney Injury VI: Nursing Management

