Computerized Tests of Team Performance and Crew Coordination Suitable for Military/Aviation Settings

Area of Science:

• Human Factors and Ergonomics
• Team Performance Measurement
• Cognitive Systems Engineering

Background:

• Numerous team performance tests exist without standardization, hindering comparative research.
• This study focuses on accessible, low-to-medium fidelity computerized team performance tests.
• Applicability to military and aviation contexts, including command, control, communication, and crew coordination, is a key consideration.

Purpose of the Study:

• To systematically review and identify suitable computerized team performance tests.
• To determine which tests are most applicable for military and aviation research.
• To provide recommendations for researchers selecting team performance assessment tools.

Main Methods:

• A comprehensive search identified computerized measures of team performance.
• Literature searches included DTIC, Psychinfo, and PubMed databases.
• Researchers actively solicited input from team performance experts at conferences and via electronic communication.

Main Results:

• 57 potential tests were evaluated against six selection criteria.
• Seven tests were identified as most suitable for military applications: AEDGE, C3Conflict, NeoCITIES, DDD, DuoWOMBAT, LDS, and PLATT.
• Detailed strengths and weaknesses of each recommended test are provided.

Conclusions:

• Adopting standardized computerized test batteries can enhance group performance evaluation.
• This facilitates the assessment of interventions in military and aerospace operational environments.
• Standardization aids in improving team coordination and overall group effectiveness.