Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 26, 2026

Experimental Methods to Study Human Postural Control
Published on: September 11, 2019
Adaptation effects in static postural control by providing simultaneous visual feedback of center of pressure and
Kenta Takeda1, Hiroki Mani2, Naoya Hasegawa1
1Graduate School of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, N12-W5, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-0812, Japan.
Background:
The benefit of visual feedback of the center of pressure (COP) on quiet standing is still debatable. This study aimed to investigate the adaptation effects of visual feedback training using both the COP and center of gravity (COG) during quiet standing.
Methods:
Thirty-four healthy young adults were divided into three groups randomly (COP + COG, COP, and control groups). A force plate was used to calculate the coordinates of the COP in the anteroposterior (COPAP) and mediolateral (COPML) directions. A motion analysis system was used to calculate the coordinates of the center of mass (COM) in both directions (COMAP and COMML). The coordinates of the COG in the AP direction (COGAP) were obtained from the force plate signals. Augmented visual feedback was presented on a screen in the form of fluctuation circles in the vertical direction that moved upward as the COPAP and/or COGAP moved forward and vice versa. The COP + COG group received the real-time COPAP and COGAP feedback simultaneously, whereas the COP group received the real-time COPAP feedback only. The control group received no visual feedback. In the training session, the COP + COG group was required to maintain an even distance between the COPAP and COGAP and reduce the COGAP fluctuation, whereas the COP group was required to reduce the COPAP fluctuation while standing on a foam pad. In test sessions, participants were instructed to keep their standing posture as quiet as possible on the foam pad before (pre-session) and after (post-session) the training sessions.
Results:
In the post-session, the velocity and root mean square of COMAP in the COP + COG group were lower than those in the control group. In addition, the absolute value of the sum of the COP - COM distances in the COP + COG group was lower than that in the COP group. Furthermore, positive correlations were found between the COMAP velocity and COP - COM parameters.
Conclusions:
The results suggest that the novel visual feedback training that incorporates the COPAP-COGAP interaction reduces postural sway better than the training using the COPAP alone during quiet standing. That is, even COPAP fluctuation around the COGAP would be effective in reducing the COMAP velocity.
More Related Videos
07:52Evaluating Postural Control and Lower-extremity Muscle Activation in Individuals with Chronic Ankle Instability
Published on: September 18, 2020
14:52Computerized Dynamic Posturography for Postural Control Assessment in Patients with Intermittent Claudication
Published on: December 11, 2013
Related Concept Videos
Center of Gravity
Center of Gravity
To determine its location, the principle of moments can be utilized by dividing the object into...
Finding the Center of Gravity
Internal Forces and Center of Gravity
Internal forces are generated within a body due to the interaction between its particles. These forces can be categorized into tension, compression, and...