Share capitalism and worker wellbeing.
Alex Bryson1, Andrew E Clark2, Richard B Freeman3
1UCL, NIESR, and IZA, United Kingdom.
Summary
Worker wellbeing depends on how pay is determined, not just the amount. Group-based pay schemes, like profit sharing and share ownership, boost job satisfaction beyond higher wages.
Area of Science:
- Workplace Psychology
- Human Resource Management
- Organizational Behavior
Background:
- Traditional focus on individual performance-related pay (PRP) in compensation research.
- Limited understanding of how the determination of compensation impacts worker wellbeing.
- Need to explore the role of group-based performance schemes in job satisfaction.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the impact of compensation determination methods on worker wellbeing.
- To examine the relationship between group-performance schemes and job satisfaction.
- To assess if pay methods influence wellbeing independently of wage levels.
Main Methods:
- Utilized a variety of statistical methods to control for unobserved individual and job-specific characteristics.
- Analyzed the association between receipt of group-performance schemes and job satisfaction.
- Controlled for wage levels to isolate the effect of pay determination methods.
Main Results:
- Group-performance schemes (profit shares, group bonuses, share ownership) are linked to higher job satisfaction.
- This positive association persists even after accounting for wage levels.
- Share ownership (share capitalism) contributes to wellbeing by fostering reciprocity and mitigating negative job quality effects.
Conclusions:
- The method of compensation determination significantly influences worker wellbeing.
- Group-based pay schemes enhance job satisfaction beyond the effects of higher wages.
- Share capitalism positively impacts wellbeing through reciprocity and by buffering adverse job conditions.
Related Concept Videos
Social Relationships and Well-Being
367
The significance of social relationships in psychological well-being is a well-established area of inquiry within social psychology. Research consistently demonstrates that the presence of meaningful, supportive relationships enhances emotional health, while the absence or deterioration of such connections can contribute to psychological distress. Relationships serve as a foundation for emotional support, identity, and social belonging, all of which are critical to an individual’s overall...
367
Traits, Mood, and Subjective Wellbeing
338
Subjective well-being (SWB) refers to an individual's self-evaluation of their overall life satisfaction, happiness, and fulfillment. This multifaceted construct is typically assessed by analyzing the balance of positive and negative emotions alongside perceptions of life satisfaction. Personality traits such as neuroticism and extraversion are strongly associated with variations in SWB, offering critical insights into the underlying mechanisms of emotional well-being.
Neuroticism and...
Neuroticism and...
338
Equity Theory
332
Equity theory explains how our sense of fairness influences the dynamics of close relationships. Rooted in social psychology, the theory posits that individuals evaluate fairness by comparing the ratio of their contributions to the rewards they receive. Relationship satisfaction is highest when these ratios are perceived as balanced between partners, promoting mutual reciprocity and a sense of justice.Equity vs. Equality in RelationshipsEquity is distinct from equality. Fairness does not...
332
Social Exchange Theory
561
As formulated by John Thibaut and Harold Kelley, Social Exchange Theory explains human relationships as economic-like exchanges that maximize rewards and minimize costs. This theory suggests that individuals engage in relationships to gain benefits and reduce burdens, similar to economic transactions. It has been widely applied to various types of relationships, including romantic, professional, and social interactions.Rewards and Costs in RelationshipsRelationship rewards include emotional...
561
Social Exchange Theory
40.8K
We have discussed why we form relationships, what attracts us to others, and different types of love. But what determines whether we are satisfied with and stay in a relationship? One theory that provides an explanation is social exchange theory. According to social exchange theory, we act as naïve economists in keeping a tally of the ratio of costs and benefits of forming and maintaining a relationship with others (Rusbult & Van Lange, 2003).
40.8K
Social Loafing
39.8K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
39.8K

