Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 26, 2026

04:10
Visually Sexing Loggerhead Shrike Lanius Ludovicianus Using Plumage Coloration and Pattern
Published on: March 8, 2020
6.6K
Environmental variability and population dynamics: do European and North American ducks play by the same rules?
Hannu Pöysä1, Jukka Rintala2, Douglas H Johnson3,4
1Natural Resources Institute Finland Joensuu Finland.
Ecology and Evolution
|July 21, 2017
Summary
Environmental variability, not density dependence, more strongly influences duck population dynamics across different continents and life histories. This challenges existing ecological theories on population regulation and species strategies.
Area of Science:
- Ecology and Evolutionary Biology
- Population Dynamics
- Environmental Science
Background:
- Population size fluctuations are driven by density dependence and environmental variability, but their relative impacts are poorly understood.
- Few studies empirically separate the effects of environmental variability from population processes like density dependence.
Purpose of the Study:
- To distinguish the contributions of environmental variability and density dependence to population dynamics in duck species.
- To compare population dynamics in North American prairies (variable) versus North European lakes (stable) environments.
- To test if stable environments foster stronger density dependence and if life history strategies (dabbling vs. diving ducks) align with these dynamics.
Main Methods:
- Compared population dynamics of duck species in North American (variable) and North European (stable) environments.
- Measured environmental variability as between-year fluctuations in wetland numbers.
- Assessed intraspecific interactions through density dependence.
Main Results:
- Environmental variability (wetland fluctuations) was greater in North America than Europe.
- Contrary to hypotheses, populations in stable environments were not less variable or more density-dependent.
- Diving ducks were not more stable or density-dependent than dabbling ducks; environmental variability impacted diving ducks more.
Conclusions:
- Environmental variability, rather than density dependence, was the primary driver of species abundance variations across continents and life histories.
- Findings challenge general assumptions about population regulation and the link between life history strategies and environmental influences.
- Emphasizes the need for comparative studies across different environments to validate ecological theories on population dynamics.
Keywords:
demographic stochasticitydensity dependenceenvironmental variabilityhierarchical Bayesian state‐space modelslife history strategypopulation variabilityMore Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Gene Flow
38.3K
Gene flow is the transfer of genes among populations, resulting from either the dispersal of gametes or from the migration of individuals.
38.3K
Background and Environment Affect Phenotype
7.9K
Although the genetic makeup of an organism plays a major role in determining the phenotype, there are also several environmental factors, such as temperature, oxygen availability, presence of mutagens, that can alter an organism’s phenotype.
An example of how genetic background affects phenotype can be seen in horses. The Extension gene in horses is responsible for their coat color. A wild-type gene (EE) produces black pigment in the coat, while a mutant gene (ee) produces red pigment. A...
An example of how genetic background affects phenotype can be seen in horses. The Extension gene in horses is responsible for their coat color. A wild-type gene (EE) produces black pigment in the coat, while a mutant gene (ee) produces red pigment. A...
7.9K
Mutation, Gene Flow, and Genetic Drift
64.9K
In a population that is not at Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, the frequency of alleles changes over time. Therefore, any deviations from the five conditions of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium can alter the genetic variation of a given population. Conditions that change the genetic variability of a population include mutations, natural selection, non-random mating, gene flow, and genetic drift (small population size).
64.9K
Conservation of Declining Populations
13.5K
Conservation of declining population focuses on ways of detecting, diagnosing, and halting a population decline. The approach uses methods to prevent populations from going extinct.
13.5K
Genetic Drift
44.4K
Natural selection—probably the most well-known evolutionary mechanism—increases the prevalence of traits that enhance survival and reproduction. However, evolution does not merely propagate favorable traits, nor does it always benefit populations.
44.4K
Conservation of Small Populations
17.5K
Small population sizes put a species at extreme risk of extinction due to a lack of variation, and a consequent decrease in adaptability. This weakens the chances of survival under pressures such as climate change, competition from other species, or new diseases. Large populations are more likely to survive pressures such as these, as such populations are more likely to harbor individuals that have genetic variants that are adaptive under new stresses. Small populations are much less...
17.5K

