Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

1.4K
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
1.4K
What is an Experiment?01:12

What is an Experiment?

19.3K
An experiment is a planned activity carried out under controlled conditions. The purpose of an experiment is to investigate the relationship between two variables. When one variable causes change in another, we call the first variable the explanatory or independent variable. The affected variable is called the response or dependent variable. In a randomized experiment, the researcher manipulates values of the explanatory variable and measures the resulting changes in the response variable. The...
19.3K
Preventive Healthcare Services01:30

Preventive Healthcare Services

2.2K
Preventive healthcare services keep people healthy via frequent check-ups, screening, and counseling. They primarily aid in disease prevention rather than treating an acute or chronic illness. Preventive treatment also keeps individuals productive and energetic, allowing them to work well into their retirement years. Examples of preventive care services include:
2.2K
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

892
Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
892
Causality in Epidemiology01:21

Causality in Epidemiology

1.8K
Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...
1.8K
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine02:50

Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine

6.2K
Combining two or more treatment methods increases the life span of cancer patients while reducing damage to vital organs or tissue from the overuse of a single treatment. Combination therapy also targets different cancer-inducing pathways, thus reducing the chances of developing resistance to treatment.
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
6.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Impact of Sparse Datasets When Harmonizing Data from Studies with Different Measures of the Same Construct.

Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research·2024
Same author

Retrospective Psychometrics and Effect Heterogeneity in Integrated Data Analysis: Commentary on the Special Issue.

Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research·2023
Same author

When Is It Time to Revise or Adapt Our Prevention Programs? Introduction to Special Issue on Using Baseline Target Moderation to Assess Variation in Prevention Impact.

Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research·2022
Same author

Heterogeneity in the Effects of Interventions to Prevent Depression in Couples Facing Job Loss: Studying Baseline Target Moderation of Impact.

Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research·2022
Same author

Evaluating construct equivalence of youth depression measures across multiple measures and multiple studies.

Psychological assessment·2019
Same author

Combining Stress Exposure and Stress Generation: Does Neuroticism Alter the Dynamic Interplay of Stress, Depression, and Anxiety Following Job Loss?

Journal of personality·2016

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 26, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

15.4K

Preventive Effect Heterogeneity: Causal Inference in Personalized Prevention.

George W Howe1

  • 1Department of Psychology, George Washington University, 2125 G Street NW, Washington, DC, 20052, USA. ghowe@gwu.edu.

Prevention Science : the Official Journal of the Society for Prevention Research
|July 21, 2017
PubMed
Summary

This study explores preventive effect heterogeneity for personalized interventions. It introduces the baseline target moderated mediation (BTMM) design to strengthen causal inference and develop targeted prevention strategies.

Keywords:
Causal inferenceModerationPersonalized preventionResearch design

More Related Videos

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 26, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

15.4K
Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.5K

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Biostatistics
  • Public Health

Background:

  • Understanding variation in preventive effects is crucial for personalized interventions.
  • Causal interaction and effect heterogeneity represent distinct forms of this variation.
  • Existing methods require refinement for robust causal inference in personalized prevention.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To differentiate and explore two forms of preventive effect heterogeneity: causal interaction and effect heterogeneity.
  • To introduce and advocate for the baseline target moderated mediation (BTMM) design.
  • To provide methods for developing personalized prevention targeting strategies using BTMM.

Main Methods:

  • Employs a causal inference framework.
  • Discusses causal interaction with manipulable moderators and effect heterogeneity with stable characteristics.
  • Proposes the baseline target moderated mediation (BTMM) design for strengthened causal inference.

Main Results:

  • Distinguishes between nonadditive effects from causal interaction and variation in causal structure from effect heterogeneity.
  • Highlights BTMM as a promising design for personalized prevention.
  • Reviews methods for addressing moderation confounding, including propensity score matching.

Conclusions:

  • Personalized interventions can be advanced by understanding and leveraging different forms of preventive effect heterogeneity.
  • The BTMM design offers a robust framework for causal inference and targeting in prevention.
  • Further research and application of methods like propensity score matching are needed to minimize confounding in moderation analysis.