An Evaluation of the Addition of Critical Congenital Heart Defect Screening in Georgia Newborn Screening Procedures

Shelby T Rentmeester1, Johanna Pringle2, Carol R Hogue3

  • 1Department of Behavioral Science and Health Education, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Rd NE, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA. Shelby.Rentmeester@emory.edu.

Insights

Georgia

Area of Science:

  • Public Health
  • Neonatal Care
  • Screening Programs

Background:

  • Critical congenital heart defects (CCHDs) affect approximately 7200 U.S. infants annually.
  • Georgia mandated CCHD screening in January 2015.
  • Hospital performance in CCHD screening post-mandate requires evaluation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate hospital performance of mandated CCHD screenings in Georgia.
  • To analyze reporting rates and identify factors associated with screening compliance.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of DPH newborn screening surveillance data (6 months pre- and post-mandate).
  • Chi-square tests to assess association between reporting and hospital nursery level (I, II, III) and NICU submissions.
  • Evaluation of CCHD screening report submission and positive CCHD screening results.

Main Results:

  • Screening reports increased post-mandate, but data for ~40% of newborns were missing.
  • Hospitals with Level III nurseries showed poorer reporting rates than Level I or II.
  • NICU submissions were less likely to include CCHD screening results than Labor & Delivery units.

Conclusions:

  • Improvement needed in CCHD screening and reporting, especially in Level III nurseries and NICUs.
  • Addressing compliance and reporting issues is crucial for improving newborn screening rates.
  • Focus on vulnerable newborns to ensure equitable screening outcomes.