Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 26, 2026
09:51
Laparoscopic Anterior Right Hepatectomy: A Single-Center Experience
Published on: December 4, 2023
1.8K
Hartmann's reversal: a comparative study between laparoscopic and open approaches.
Han Deok Kwak1, Jin Kim2, Dong Woo Kang2
1Department of Surgery, Chonnam National University Hospital, Gwangju, Republic of Korea.
ANZ Journal of Surgery
|July 22, 2017
Summary
Laparoscopic reversal of Hartmann's procedure offers faster bowel function recovery compared to open surgery. This minimally invasive approach is a viable option for patients, even after prior open procedures.
Area of Science:
- Colorectal Surgery
- Minimally Invasive Surgery
- Surgical Outcomes
Background:
- Hartmann's procedure reversal can be performed laparoscopically or openly.
- Laparoscopic reversal presents unique surgical challenges.
- Comparative studies are essential to evaluate different surgical approaches.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the outcomes of laparoscopic reversal (LR) versus open reversal (OR) of Hartmann's procedure.
- To assess the feasibility and efficacy of LR.
- To identify potential advantages of the laparoscopic approach.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from 29 patients.
- Patients underwent either LR (n=17) or OR (n=12).
- Comparison of patient characteristics, operation time, and postoperative recovery metrics.
Main Results:
- No significant differences in operation time, hospital stay, or complication rates between LR and OR.
- Faster bowel movement resumption observed in the LR group (1.8 vs 2.8 days, P=0.020).
- Significantly less blood loss in the LR group (114.1 vs 594.2 mL, P=0.026).
Conclusions:
- Laparoscopic reversal of Hartmann's procedure leads to quicker recovery of bowel function.
- The laparoscopic approach is feasible and effective, even for patients with prior open Hartmann's procedure.
- LR demonstrates advantages in reduced blood loss and faster functional recovery.
