Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Torts I01:14

Torts I

1.7K
Torts in nursing are wrongful acts that can harm patients and potentially lead to civil liability for the involved nurse. These wrongful acts range from unintentional errors to deliberate actions. Depending on the nature and severity of the tort, a nurse found liable may face financial penalties or disciplinary actions. Understanding the distinctions between intentional, quasi-intentional, and unintentional torts is crucial for nurses to mitigate risks and provide safe patient care.
Intentional...
1.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evaluation of Time and Productivity Costs of Purified Protein Derivative (PPD) Testing.

Quality management in health care·2026
Same author

Reply to: "Comment on 'AI implementation: radiologists' perspectives on AI-enabled opportunistic CT screening'".

Clinical imaging·2025
Same author

Medicare reimbursement for interventional pain procedures: 2000 to 2023.

Interventional pain medicine·2024
Same author

Reply to: "Comment: Radiologists' Perspectives on AI and Opportunistic CT Screening (OS)".

Clinical imaging·2024
Same author

AI implementation: Radiologists' perspectives on AI-enabled opportunistic CT screening.

Clinical imaging·2024
Same author

Primary care provider perspectives on the value of opportunistic CT screening.

Clinical imaging·2024
Same journal

Does preoperative depression predict return to sport and exercise after degenerative spine surgery?

Journal of neurosurgery. Spine·2026
Same journal

Photodynamic diagnosis using 5-aminolevulinic acid in surgery for spinal cord astrocytic tumors: a propensity score-matched comparison with brain tumors.

Journal of neurosurgery. Spine·2026
Same journal

Editorial. Rethinking spinal cord gliomas: beyond the intracranial paradigm.

Journal of neurosurgery. Spine·2026
Same journal

Oncological and neurological outcomes after parent rootlet resection in functionally critical spinal schwannomas: a retrospective multicenter comparative study.

Journal of neurosurgery. Spine·2026
Same journal

Risk factors for elevated endotracheal tube cuff pressure in anterior cervical spine surgery.

Journal of neurosurgery. Spine·2026
Same journal

Does postoperative gabapentinoid prescription reduce chronic opioid use following short-segment lumbar instrumentation?

Journal of neurosurgery. Spine·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 26, 2026

Spinal Hernia Repair and Cauda Equina Repositioning After Lumbar Decompression under Three-Dimensional Microscopy: A Case Report and Literature Review
04:33

Spinal Hernia Repair and Cauda Equina Repositioning After Lumbar Decompression under Three-Dimensional Microscopy: A Case Report and Literature Review

Published on: November 8, 2024

951

Malpractice litigation following spine surgery.

Alan H Daniels1,2, Roy Ruttiman3,2, Adam E M Eltorai3,2

  • 1Division of Spine Surgery.

Journal of Neurosurgery. Spine
|July 22, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Delays in diagnosing or treating spine surgery complications increase the likelihood of malpractice litigation favoring the plaintiff. Catastrophic complications significantly raise award amounts and predict unfavorable rulings for physicians.

Keywords:
complicationsmalpracticepredictorsspine surgery

More Related Videos

Minimally Invasive Treatment for Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture Using Sagittal Alignment Screws and A Trauma Reduction Device
04:19

Minimally Invasive Treatment for Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture Using Sagittal Alignment Screws and A Trauma Reduction Device

Published on: November 8, 2024

1.5K
Surgical Approach and Complications of Stand-alone Lateral Trans-Psoas Interbody Fusion
05:30

Surgical Approach and Complications of Stand-alone Lateral Trans-Psoas Interbody Fusion

Published on: February 14, 2025

1.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 26, 2026

Spinal Hernia Repair and Cauda Equina Repositioning After Lumbar Decompression under Three-Dimensional Microscopy: A Case Report and Literature Review
04:33

Spinal Hernia Repair and Cauda Equina Repositioning After Lumbar Decompression under Three-Dimensional Microscopy: A Case Report and Literature Review

Published on: November 8, 2024

951
Minimally Invasive Treatment for Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture Using Sagittal Alignment Screws and A Trauma Reduction Device
04:19

Minimally Invasive Treatment for Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture Using Sagittal Alignment Screws and A Trauma Reduction Device

Published on: November 8, 2024

1.5K
Surgical Approach and Complications of Stand-alone Lateral Trans-Psoas Interbody Fusion
05:30

Surgical Approach and Complications of Stand-alone Lateral Trans-Psoas Interbody Fusion

Published on: February 14, 2025

1.6K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Malpractice
  • Spine Surgery Litigation
  • Surgical Complications

Background:

  • Adverse events in spine surgery can lead to medical malpractice lawsuits.
  • Limited research exists on the association between spine surgery complications and litigation outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Identify frequent causes of alleged malpractice in spine surgery.
  • Analyze patient and clinical factors linked to medical negligence litigation.
  • Understand outcomes and awards in spine surgery malpractice cases.

Main Methods:

  • Searched medicolegal database (VerdictSearch) for spine surgery cases (1988-2015).
  • Examined demographic, clinical, and legal data from 234 relevant cases.
  • Classified complications as catastrophic (e.g., spinal cord injury, death) or non-catastrophic.
  • Used chi-square and t-tests to analyze variables affecting outcomes and awards.

Main Results:

  • Delays in diagnosis or treatment significantly increased the likelihood of plaintiff verdicts or settlements.
  • Catastrophic complications were associated with a higher rate of physician loss (66.7%) and larger award amounts ($6.1M vs $2.9M).
  • Settlements averaged significantly less ($1.9M) than plaintiff rulings ($4.0M).

Conclusions:

  • Delays in diagnosis and treatment are key predictors of malpractice litigation outcomes favoring plaintiffs.
  • Catastrophic complications strongly correlate with substantial plaintiff awards and physician liability.
  • Settlements represent a financially less costly outcome for physician defendants compared to losing in court.